<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking &#187; Hybrid Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/category/hybrid-culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jameshollow.com</link>
	<description>Imagining a Hybrid World from Tokyo - A blog by James Hollow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2018 23:11:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Japanese Innovation: The machine that changed the world</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/japanese-innovation-the-machine-that-changed-the-world/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/japanese-innovation-the-machine-that-changed-the-world/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A little while ago I read a book called The Machine That Changed the World, written in 1990 as a summary of a 5 year $5m MIT research project into the global automobile market. I discovered it while looking for the best description of the most sophisticated, long-term-successful manufacturing organisation &#38; method (of complex technology) the world has ever produced, and I am tempted to believe that this book describes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/japanese-innovation-the-machine-that-changed-the-world/">Japanese Innovation: The machine that changed the world</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_562" style="width: 227px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Manufacturing_Translation.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-562" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Manufacturing_Translation.jpg" alt="The management theory classic that told the Toyota story for the first time" width="217" height="346" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The management theory classic that told the Toyota story for the first time</p></div>
<p>A little while ago I read a book called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Machine-That-Changed-World-Revolutionizing/dp/0743299795">The Machine That Changed the World</a>, written in 1990 as a summary of a 5 year $5m MIT research project into the global automobile market.</p>
<p>I discovered it while looking for the best description of the most sophisticated, long-term-successful manufacturing organisation &amp; method (of complex technology) the world has ever produced, and I am tempted to believe that this book describes it. In fact I was so inspired I ended up writing my own notes and sharing them with some friends who are experts in manufacturing in order to understand what has happened since 1990. These additional insights are added at the bottom of the notes below.</p>
<p>The “machine&#8221; in question is, in a word: “Toyota”, and it describes the emergence of their “lean manufacturing” model and its subsequent proliferation to the other Japanese car manufacturers and during the 1980s more broadly to many plants in the US as well. But the story is a lot bigger than that one word, than the car industry alone,  and made me realise that I really had no idea how much mass manufacturing had evolved since its invention by Henry Ford, even before Toyota, and Japan&#8217;s other &#8220;assemblers&#8221; revolutionised it from the 50&#8217;s through to the 90s. Revolutionised is not in any way an exaggeration it seems.</p>
<p>It also made me think a lot about the potential for coupling machines with the sort of creative problem solving that still only teams of humans can deliver. We are now in the era of AI, but actually the lean manufacturing lesson informs us that we are really in the era of “humans x AI”.</p>
<h1><b>Mass production vs Lean production</b></h1>
<div>
<p>The book is structured around this dichotomy, with initially Ford, and then GM representing the most successful mass production strategies in sequence, and Toyota representing the lean model, which has since been copied by pretty much every brand that is not in the process of going extinct, starting with the Japanese brands (Honda, Mazda&#8230;) and interestingly Ford on the US side, and GM were trying hard even by the late 80&#8217;s. The Koreans have been trying to copy &#8220;the Toyota way&#8221; quite blatantly since this book was written as well, so it is still going on, although as the Japanese makers have had to globalise their manufacturing operations for various reasons the purity of their model has perhaps been diluted when looked at as a global entity, although all retain manufacturing and assembly plants in Japan.</p>
<p>At the point of writing the book, the lean manufacturers seemed to be unstoppable, and their rivals were scrabbling to catch up by studying and adopting the same management techniques as Toyota and others. Since then Toyota has become the largest car company in the world, the mimickers like Ford have done pretty well, the hard-to-adapters like GM have struggled, and Toyota has achieved this at the same time as having to become a more multi-national, decentralised machine, which many thought it could never become. So the intervening years seem to verify the message of the book. They have certainly not disproved its premises.</p>
<h2><b>How transferable are the lessons from this book?</b></h2>
<p>Perhaps more than anything I was struck by the conceptual clarity of the ideas upon which lean production was founded. It&#8217;s two inventors at Toyota, Sakichi Toyoda and Taiichi Ohno should be household names the world over, ranked alongside Ford and Edison. Perhaps though the nature of their ideas for organising people and resources put them nearer Marx, Engels or even Keynes. For sure the ideas emerged from the context their inventors found themselves in, specifically post war Japan, with no capital to deploy, a tiny domestic market, very limited resources, employee-biased labour laws&#8230; but then all big thinkers and their ideas are products of their time and place so this should not diminish their achievements.</p>
<p>So these core ideas and how they apply to the various aspects of manufacturing and with what consequence should be essential knowledge to anyone trying to create a business founded on:</p>
<div>&#8211; producing a complex assembled technology as a product at scale</div>
<div>&#8211; targeting increasing productivity over time</div>
<div>&#8211; as well as improving product quality (lack of faults) over time</div>
<div>&#8211; where a learning curve plays out for each product model produced</div>
<div>&#8211; where new models can be produced without long delays &amp; large capital injections</div>
<div>&#8211; retaining skilled employees and loyal, co-invested partners</div>
<div>
<p>&#8211; where the whole process is tuned into both the markets needs and fundamental science / technology breakthroughs</p>
<h2><b>What mass manufacturing does well</b></h2>
<div>
<p>Mass manufacturing replaced the craft industries, starting with bespoke car production, but ultimately pretty much all craft manufacturing, so that craftsmanship was sidelined to small market niches, usually exclusive and expensive. It did this by turning the production process into one big machine, within which tasks were atomised and delineated to such an extent that most of the humans involved in it, everyone in fact except the designers, engineers and business management, were given one simple repetitive task to perform that at most took 5mins to learn and did not require to engage their brains while on the job.</p>
<p>What this machine did really well, as still does where conditions suit it, is make one thing at scale, taking advantages of economies of scale to drive down costs. This is exactly what Ford wanted to do with the Model T, and succeeded, and only failed in the end because ultimately the market&#8217;s needs fragmented and began to evolve faster than Ford&#8217;s big manufacturing machine could adapt to, and therein lies a key weakness of this model. Knowledge is embodied mainly in the hardware of the manufacturing machine itself, not the people running it. This hardware is expensive, and optimised for scale (e.g. stamping out steel plates at 50 per minute) but cannot be optimised for flexibility (stamping different sized sheets, or speed to switch to an alternative shape). Consequently, when he changed car models, Ford would have to throw out half his machinery too. This still made economic sense throughout the 1920’s, but by the mid 1930s GM had got their more flexible “shared platforms, different models” up and running and it was starting to cost Ford dear.</p>
<p>GM took over the gauntlet through the business genius of a guy called Sloane, who created 5 consumer facing brands (Lincoln, Chevrolet etc) that shared most of the same platforms and parts with each other, and hence enjoyed the benefits of scale as Ford&#8217;s model, actually more so, but by having 5 distinct brands, was able to meet the increasing diverse needs of the vast majority of Americans, and via overseas subsidiaries like Opel and Vauxhall, a lot of Europe too. So as a model it had more plurality and options, but was still essentially driven by the same manufacturing machine, and the role of humans as unthinking cogs in the machine remained the same as in Ford’s original conception.</p>
<h2><b>Characteristics of the mass production machine:</b></h2>
<ul>
<li>It tends to invest in big hardware, to achieve economies of scale (e.g. massive steel panel pressing machines with high throughput), and in so doing become systematically vested in the status quo, defined by the technical capabilities of the hardware, and less able to adapt to change</li>
<li>Because &#8220;feeding the machines&#8221; and an ethos of &#8220;move the metal&#8221; become dominant, the system requires large inventories, e.g. weeks or months worth of steel panels piled up waiting to be fed into the steel panel press outside. Big inventories are financial liabilities in times of change and or downturns and again create inflexibility</li>
<li>Because of this same &#8220;move the metal&#8221; ethos, and because the employees, if they are thinking anything, it is to keep things moving to meet today&#8217;s production quota, mistakes in assembly, flawed parts get built into products, and layers of assembly bury them, until they are incredibly hard to discover or put right. Hence the MP machine is prone to quality issues and is actually not very efficient at all.</li>
</ul>
<h2><b>What &#8220;quality&#8221; becomes in the mass production model</b></h2>
<p>Because of the mass production machine’s tendency to output faulty products, all of the big car plants had testing facilities and massive product recovery areas devoted to discovering the root cause of problems and putting them right, often failing or at best patching a problem. Hence reliability issues were always present in the products shipped to consumers.</p>
<p>Throughout the era of mass production dominance, perhaps from the 30s to the 90s, and perhaps still today with some manufacturers, quality equated to the investment into the recovery yards: then rigour that went into testing and the extent of the artisanal efforts to fix problems. So for instance the high end German brands reputations right through tothe 90s and perhaps still today to some extent are built on the &#8220;craftsman&#8221;-like skills of fixing flaws in cars that came off a production and assembly system essentially no more sophisticated than that of Henry Ford&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Again, this is not an efficient model and only works because of economies of scale that are built up, often state supported.</p>
<h2><b>Inspiration for lean production model inventors</b></h2>
<p>Ford&#8217;s flagship plant in Detroit became a Mecca for aspiring car manufacturers, and Ford was commendably open about showing people round. Most visitors were awestruck and went home with the intention to emulate it’s scale and automation as best they could.</p>
<p>Perhaps because they were quite late to the party, visiting in the late 40s and perhaps because they understood that emulation was not viable being from a country as weak as Japan was after the war, (any small businesses likely to get gobbled up by Uncle Sam&#8217;s corporate giants), Toyoda and Ohno went away thinking &#8220;there is waste in that system, waste we cannot afford&#8221; and hence they had important clues for how their model needed to be different.</p>
<p>++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>So the lean model itself; let&#8217;s start by reviewing its achievements. Lean manufacturing has proven itself beyond all doubt to deliver:<br />
&#8211; higher productivity (ready-to-ship products per unit inputs: capital investment, operational costs, workers, physical space)<br />
&#8211; higher quality (fewer errors hiding in shipped products)<br />
&#8211; greater agility: faster and cheaper development of and switching of production to new products<br />
&#8211; robustness to market cyclicality (although this one alone is a complex)</p>
<h2><b>Founding insights</b></h2>
<p>The early insights that Toyoda and Ohno observed that underpinned their thinking:</p>
<ul>
<li>The best mass production plants have a lot of &#8220;muda&#8221; = waste, not least in the rework shops that fix faulty products that come off the end of the line, 25% of human resource, 20% of space are typical</li>
<li>Because of the focus on &#8220;move the metal&#8221;, i.e. getting as many completed units off the end of the assembly line, so an unwillingness to stop the assembly line, errors (faulty parts, badly fitted parts etc) were compounded as they went down the line, errors that were hard to fix (lots of reworking) or impossible to find (faulty shipped products)</li>
<li>Smaller batches work out cheaper than big ones. Much of Ford and GMs success had come through developing massive machines to make parts in massive batches, e.g. steel panel presses, with very high throughput. But embodying so much value and knowledge into these machines compromises their ability to change what is produced,  and errors in the parts were multiplied faster. By focusing on being able to CHANGE the output much easier, and making &#8220;Just enough&#8221; sized batches, the overall efficiency could be greatly improved.</li>
<li>The mass production &#8220;machine&#8221; demotivated its workers, so they had no stake in catching errors and improving quality, only in meeting quota day by day.</li>
</ul>
<p>Based on these, I believe there are three key concepts that hold the keys to the lean model:</p>
<h3><b>1) Fragility drives productivity</b></h3>
<p>For me perhaps the most brilliant, insightful idea that Ohno came up with was that you could create the most efficient and error-free manufacturing machine by making it extremely fragile.Anything can stop the manufacturing machine moving at any time:<br />
&#8211; every single person on the assembly line has a chord they could pull to stop the whole line, and are encourage to do so the moment they suspect a problem with half-assembled product on the line. (In mass production lines only the factory foreman had a switch, and would hate to stop it because it could mean they miss quota that day)<br />
&#8211; parts arrive literally &#8220;just in time&#8221; before the previous delivery runs out, and many parts deliveries would be as frequent as hourly. (In contrast mass production&#8217;s assembly lines would typically have months worth of parts piled up at its side)<br />
&#8211; parts are actually MADE just in time. The box carrying the parts arriving back at the supplier factory is the signal to start making more of those parts</p>
<p>But surely making it so easy to stop would lower production since it would be stopping all the time? Yes, this is true, at the start, but over time &#8220;the machine” learns how not to have to stop all the time. How does it learn? People is how. Instead of the mental paradigm being to push units off the end of the line, it switches to tracing the source of errors UP the line.</p>
<h3><b>2) People as agile problem solvers</b></h3>
<p>In the mass production model the people are only there because a machine has not been invented yet that could do their job. (Still the case for many manufacturing jobs, but not for much longer!). They are not required to think.</p>
<p>In the lean production model the workers are required to be super-sensitive to the condition of the machine, it is so fragile after all, and react as problem-solvers to fix issues in real time, whatever their nature and irrespective of the nature of the issue:<br />
&#8211; they have to learn to spot problems, even tiny ones, say with a part that does not quite fit snugly.<br />
&#8211; they have to learn to snoop out the origin of problems. Ohno and Toyoda came up with the &#8220;5 why&#8217;s&#8221; practice back in the 50s: basically ask why at least 5 times in rooting out the cause of a problem to REALLY make sure you have got to the very bottom of it, often requiring a trip to the suppliers. Nothing moves until you do.<br />
&#8211; they have to support each other, literally all rushing to help fix a problem if and when it arises, usually grouped into a small team with complementary but overlapping skills<br />
&#8211; working groups have a &#8220;leader&#8221; usually the most experienced, so that they can cover for any one of the team if they are sick or away, so the people have to solve people issues too as a team</p>
<h3><b>3) The philosophy of continuous improvement (<i>kaizen</i>)</b></h3>
<p>This is the one that everyone knows, to the extent that it has almost become a cliche. It is thesame as 2) really, only applied to the system as a whole, and focused on improvements not just solving problems, e.g. in the supply chain, distribution, marketing, everything. In contrast to the various macro-areas of the system, especially the supply chain, acting as self-serving agents, with the &#8216;invisible hand&#8217; supposedly assuring efficient interaction and transaction, all parties in the system are co-invested in its continuous improvement, e.g. in terms of minimising errors, reducing costs, increasing flexibility, sharing financial risk.</p>
<p>+++++++++++++</p>
<p>There is a lot else to say, but I believe that these two ideas are the fundamental ones that all the other beneficial effects spring from.</p>
<p>So from these:<br />
1) make the machine ultimately fragile<br />
2) empower its people to be the ever vigilant, ever problem-solving nurturers of the machine<br />
3) collective striving for continuous improvement<br />
&#8230; the effects below emerge as behaviours of the machine. In this way I think the overall system is actually closer to an organism, or organic system, than to a &#8220;machine&#8221;. Or perhaps the lean model is the point in history at which complex industrial machines become more fundamentally &#8220;alive&#8221;.</p>
<p>++++++++++++++</p>
<h2> <b>A lean core</b></h2>
<p>Toyota as a company employs fewer people, has smaller plants, carries less inventory, owns less manufacturing equipment per unit shipped than any car company, and that&#8217;s why it is themost successful. Ford first and later GM gained unprecedented scale by pushing the balance of &#8220;make or buy&#8221; way over to the make yourself extreme than anyone had attempted before, and that is what grew the car industry into the world&#8217;s biggest, because it drove economies of scale, but also created vast &#8220;muda&#8221;.</p>
<p>In contrast Toyota strikes the balance towards the &#8220;buy&#8221; extreme, but in a very different supplier &lt; &gt; assembler dynamic that pushes the same problem-chasing mentality, and shared responsibility for minimising waste, kaizen, and producing cars to a target product price, called &#8220;value engineering&#8221;, that lean manufacturers employ internally.</p>
<p>So Toyota sits atop an ecosystem of co-vested, usually co-owned (e.g. Toyota has a 10 / 15% ownership of Denso, Denso owns a few % of Toyota) companies that are free to work with other assemblers, and with which cost-reduction margin gains are shared, hence allowing the partner suppliers to invest in improving their own manufacturing operation (people, machines, analytics etc). This kind of designed mutuality is not unique to car manufacturing in Japan, and something similar can be seen in the zaibatsu structures as well.</p>
<h2><b>Anticipation &amp; judgement</b></h2>
<p>The machine&#8217;s humans learn to react with speed and agility to solve problems, but over time as they get tuned into the machines characteristics they learn to anticipate its needs and issues, and act &#8220;just before&#8221; a problem occurs. This includes the people that work at the parts suppliers as well, since they are &#8220;wired into&#8221; the machine very tightly also.</p>
<p>Judgement is decentralised, shared between everyone involved, so that everyone&#8217;s judgement can effect everyone else. This pressure has the effect of making people think more not less.</p>
<h3><b><span style="color: #222222"><b><b>Shared responsibility for avoiding mistakes and </b>“kaizen” &#8211; i.e. vested partnerships</b></span></b></h3>
<p>If a supplier delivers a batch of faulty parts, the whole machine will stop, the 5-why’s process exposes the cause, and everyone in the whole ecosystem of supply and assembly will know what happened. This has the effect of creating transparent accountability and extending the mental awareness of what constitutes “the machine” among operators throughout. More pressure on everyone to not screw up &#8211; yes, but more meaningful and rewarding when the whole process sings along with zero flaws. In the mass manufacturing model where this sort of transparency does not exist units are assembled and the problems are buried under layers of assembly and hence hard to assign accountability.</p>
<p>So across and up and down the organically structured interrelationships lean manufacturing creates shared responsibility. It&#8217;s accountability. Same goes if a work group high up on the assembly line keeps making assembly errors. It goes for everything. Arguably this is &#8220;stressful&#8221; but most research has shown that workers prefer to be part of this psychological paradigm than one in which no one cares about quality, and an individual is treated as a yet-to-be-automated disposable non-asset.</p>
<p>The more positive flip side of this is the fact that anyone from any level or any area is empowered to, actually required to suggest improvements to their part of the system or in fact the whole  system ensuring it is always progressing and evolving. This is not just about the removal of errors. The essence of kaizen is to find innovative ways to evolve the machine over time. Not innovation to reinvent the whole machine, but smart “hacks” that increase efficiency, speed, reduce waste… And these improvements are rewarded in a number of ways, not least through the profit sharing, savings-sharing financial relationships between supplier and assembler, thus incentivising genuinely creative thinking not just vigilance. Suppliers are able to apply these incremental breakthroughs to other supplier contracts, hence improving profit across their business.</p>
<h3> <b>Information, Data &amp; central control</b></h3>
<div>
<p>When early American converts to lean production went on rare pilgrimages to Toyota back as early as the 1960s a common reaction was &#8220;oh my god, the DATA those guys have on productivity, it was mind blowing”. The lean manufacturing machine&#8217;s performance is obsessively measured. Information is not captured and kept hidden in a central &#8220;brain&#8221; (see the organism metaphor keeps suggesting itself), but is shared with everyone in real time.</p>
<p>For instance, from the 80s display screens were placed on the assembly lines showing a status dashboard of information. Productivity data and analysis is shared with partners to help them make better judgements too. Of course there has to be central governance, but it is not total control as it is in Mass Production. Nor is it totally decentralised, like an ant-colony with all its parts pre-programmed to react in certain collective ways. It is a balance of central and decentral control and evolution.</p>
<h2><b>Fixed costs vs variable costs, assets</b></h2>
<div>
<p>An economic consequence of the lean approach is that unlike mass production which treats human labour and supplier relationships as variable costs that can be adjusted to the cyclicality of the market, both are counter intuitively in the lean model fixed costs. Neither employees nor supplier partners are disposable in tougher market conditions. Instead the lean model can respond by dropping product prices, increasing cost competitiveness to protect sales volume, better than competitors can (for whom big inventories become a bigger issue). Lean producers can also shift to different car models faster than mass producers can, to respond to a surge in demand for smaller, more fuel efficient cars, for instance, or to bigger SUVs as has been the recent trend.</p>
<h2><b>What happened after 1990?</b></h2>
<p>When the book was published in 1990 Toyota was half the size of GM, then the world&#8217;s biggest company. Twenty years late Toyota became the biggest car company in the world. Although the story is a lot more complex since 1990, history has clearly shown lean manufacturing and the Toyota way to be world beating.</p>
<p class="p1">According to my follow up research study with friends and acquaintances in manufacturing, which while less well funded than MIT&#8217;s seemed to reveal a reliably consistent story, the lean model is now the standard in all of major auto manufacturers globally, having been copied to various degrees of success by the US, European and Asian car companies. Hyundai for instance have systematically hired retired Toyota line managers to teach them the model. It is without doubt Japan’s single biggest contribution to the global industrial complex, and its principles are employed in numerous other manufacturing arenas where similar conditions prevail, namely high-unit volume combined with market demand for quality and durability.</p>
<p class="p1">In the car industry there has not been a significant new &#8220;revolution&#8221; on top of lean manufacturing, (although the use of sophisticated robotics is certainly a significant evolution), and lean manufacturing has probably never been achieved to the same level of perfection (flawless cars shipped, symbiotic efficiency etc) outside Japan but there have been a host of other economic and global market factors that make the narrative more complex than the one leading up to 1990, e.g. consolidation among European car brands and sharing of platforms across brands, different emissions standards in Europe meaning Diesel engines have had a perhaps unfair advantage, the financing requirements to invest in emerging markets requiring consolidated purchasing power (e.g. the NISSAN RENAULT Alliance), and of course currency fluctuations, to name but a few.</p>
<p class="p1">Today the pinnacle of lean manufacturing in terms of flawless models being shipped is apparently Lexus, Toyota&#8217;s luxury marque, models which are mostly manufactured in in Japan still.</p>
<p class="p1">Is the iPhone the product of a lean manufacturing model? Chinese assembly plants have achieved economic leanness of cost through mean-minded cost control (not my words!) and punitive control on quality, but the symbiotic partnerships and empowerment of factory workers has not been replicated, indeed FoxConn employs suicide nets in its manufacturing facilities, but the relative short life, disposable nature of smartphones, as well as their electronic as opposed to mechanical guts mean that the comparison is harder to make.</p>
<h2><b>More Japanese innovation? Human x Machine / AI hybrids</b></h2>
<p class="p1">Despite the unstoppable march of electronic devices and accompanying dematerialisation of so much of our everyday lives, humankind still needs hardware. In fact the climate crisis we face requires an industrial phenomenon to solve it, and efficiently too. Whether it is wind turbines, nuclear reactors, solar panels and batteries, and more than likely a combination of the above and some new stuff to boot, we are going to have to scale up production of zero-carbon generation hardware like never before while finding a learning curve to drive costs and energy inputs down at the same time. Efficiency will one hopes become even more incentivised across manufacturing as a whole, so it is quite possible that lean manufacturing&#8217;s biggest contribution is yet to come.</p>
<p class="p1">On a more conceptual level, the way the lean manufacturing approach coupled the potential of machines and humans to mutually empower them may point the way to the next industrial revolution. On losing to Deep Blue the chess grand master and one would assume handy problem-solver <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-cassidy/centaur-chess-shows-power_b_6383606.html" target="_blank">Garry Kasparov established a chess league</a> of what he called “The Centaurs” &#8211; a chess master combined with a chess AI, since he realised that the AI’s advantage lay in being able to access more game experience data than his brain could alone during play. The &#8220;Centaur” type hybrid chess masters of course trump any human or AI separately and represent just one example of how humans augment with AI, or vice versa, are becoming the new standard. But as the lean manufacturing story tells us humans have been amplifying the performance of mass machines for at least 50 years, and the co-evolution of technology and humans may be what defines us as a species since our origin as the tool-manipulating ape.</p>
</div>
<p class="p1">In academia today there is a burgeoning new arena of AI used as part of researchers&#8217; armoury &#8211; drug developers use evolutionary simulations to develop original molecules for instance that might have medical capplication. And of course in everyday life with Google&#8217;s AI in our pockets we have already, on the quiet become the AI-augmented species. I have little doubt that industry is going to go the same way, and not least in Japan. Japan biggest R&amp;D spenders, all of them mass / large scale manufacturers, <a href="http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Trends/Japan-Inc.-focusing-on-R-D-efforts-at-home" target="_blank">listed AI as one of the most important areas of research</a> and one of the reasons for onshoring more of their R&amp;D budgets, where the onus will be on the human partner to be creative and inventive.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/japanese-innovation-the-machine-that-changed-the-world/">Japanese Innovation: The machine that changed the world</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/japanese-innovation-the-machine-that-changed-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art of Localising Brands to Japan</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/the-art-of-localising-brands-japan/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/the-art-of-localising-brands-japan/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Localisation is the process of turning brand communications, like TV ads, websites etc, from their original language and culture into something that works in another market, language and culture. In this post I am going to categorize 3  or 4 archetypal approaches to doing this and use well-known brands to illustrate. Hopefully anyone working in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/the-art-of-localising-brands-japan/">The Art of Localising Brands to Japan</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Localisation is the process of turning brand communications, like TV ads, websites etc, from their original language and culture into something that works in another market, language and culture. In this post I am going to categorize 3  or 4 archetypal approaches to doing this and use well-known brands to illustrate. Hopefully anyone working in this space or interested in brands &#8211; or just global culture in general &#8211; can take something from it.</div>
<div id="attachment_442" style="width: 556px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Traditional_Japanese_beer_brand_posters.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-442" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Traditional_Japanese_beer_brand_posters.jpg" alt="Japan has long been importing and adapting advertising formats - in this case beer poster girls!" width="546" height="588" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Japan has long been importing and adapting advertising formats &#8211; in this case beer poster girls!</p></div>
<p>I have seen this process from both sides, initially while working in the UK office of a big international agency, where we were the hub, creating and “distributing” campaigns to other markets. But ever since arriving in Japan I have mainly been &#8220;on the receiving end&#8221; as it were, and it is exacerbated by the fact that Japan really is a different market. Whether that difference is fundamental, or one of degrees, is a question I have explored in previous posts, such as <a href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/japanese-advertising-industry-nutshell/">this one describing the Japanese advertising industry</a>, but for the purposes of this article I will focus mainly on the cultural and linguistic gap.</p>
<p>In fact, for many of the international agencies in Tokyo, most of the work they do is in-bound localisation, and if they are not empowered to properly adapt or transcreate the brand to Japan &#8211; which is often true &#8211; it can be quite an unrewarding role. It&#8217;s one of the reasons I actually got frustrated and struck out on my own from one of those big networks to start up my own agency here in Tokyo back in 2004.</p>
<p>Although 90% of the work we do at Profero Tokyo is original to Japan, from time to time we lead a localisation process, and when conducted in a strategic way, they never fail to reveal deep insights into the core brand DNA and highlight the fundamental similarities and differences between cultures, and hence can be fascinating and rewarding projects to be part of.</p>
<h1><b>The Brand Localisation Framework</b></h1>
<div>
<p>For simplicity I am going to look at localising brand taglines specifically, and use them as a proxy for brand positioning, because ultimately this is the point. I am going to use “tagline” to mean either the semi-permanent brand tagline motifs, as in “Honda &#8211; the power of dreams”, as well as product-brand taglines, and also campaign taglines, such as Apple’s &#8220;Mac vs PC&#8221;, which are obviously more transient, but essentially the process is the same.</p>
<p>In some of the examples, e.g. MasterCard, a campaign tagline ends up becoming the brand tagline, for a good few years at least, which is far from uncommon, so overall I feel confident generalising in this way.</p>
<p>It is also true that the same principles can be applied to other executional choices when localising e.g. the visual realm, choice of music, voice actor, you name it. All elements ultimately need to be considered within the same framework.</p>
<p>In general I think there are 3 approaches to bringing a global tagline into Japanese.</p>
<h2><b>Approach 1: Leave it in English</b></h2>
<ul>
<li>Although in many European markets and some Asian, proficiency in English is high enough to just go with a tagline originally crafted in English, that is not true of Japan, so unless it is really, really simple the target audience will not understand it.</li>
<li>This can be justified if you can assume that some people will get it, and for the rest spell it out in some form or another: sometimes just writing it in katakana to make it feel more familiar, or else explain it in Japanese without attempting to replace the original English.</li>
<li>This is often the most expedient approach for brands looking for global consistency more than local emotional connection.</li>
<li>I believe it is usually a big missed opportunity and only really makes sense if the brand trades off its global status almost exclusively in differentiating itself.</li>
<li>It is most likely to make sense for a brand that has lots of products that can have a product brand story told about them, and particularly if they are really innovative products.</li>
<li>An example would be Nike’s “Just do it” motif. It really helps that the original is so simple that most of their target audience would get it, and the fact that their products are designed around universal human features, namely their bodies. However, it would be wrong to believe that Nike loses nothing by not having a proposition that is as powerful in Japanese as “Just do it” is in English.</li>
<li>Another example would be the original iPod and iPod Nano TV campaign by Apple using the dancing silhouettes that became so iconic. If you have a break through product with visceral cut-through creative and your brand benefits from its foreign / global cache, then you can more or less leave it alone. These cases are fairly rare though.</li>
</ul>
<h2><b>Approach 2: “Adapting&#8221; it into the Japanese Culture</b></h2>
<ul>
<li>The adaptation approach aims to bring the same meaning to life in Japanese as a copy line that stands on its own without any mention of the English mother line</li>
<li>You usually create a variety of alternatives that range between being direct translations on one end of the spectrum, through to ones that take more license with the original meaning on the other, but might push a resonant button among the Japanese target (see option 3 below)</li>
<li>The closer you are to the direct translation end, the more it feels to the audience like a direct translation, and this serves to emphasise the foreignness of the brand again.</li>
<li>What usually happens in this scenario is you are able to hit on a copy line that more or less says what the original English line says, but it does not resonate as much as the original does in English, but the way a lot of brands think this is an acceptable price to pay for global consistency and feels like a safe choice</li>
<li>The more license you take the more chance it has to resonate and feel like a made-for-Japan communication, but at the cost of consistency with the brand globally, causing unease for global brand managers</li>
<li>Localising the tagline but then applying it to creative assets (such as TVCs, transit ad creative, web assets, etc) that have not been adapted or transcreated themselves leads to communications that do not quite add up to the local audience.</li>
<li>If a brand has the local resources to develop local creative assets then I would usually be recommending the 3rd approach below, but these lines are blurry, and there are examples where this adaptation approach has been very successful.</li>
<li>Foreign brands should not be trying to become or act like domestic Japanese brands, but rather to find a way to leverage their foreignness to give them an advantage over local competition (e.g. aspirational, innovative&#8230;.), since the local players will usually always win on grounds of familiarity. Hence retaining an element of the global campaign is often a vital ingredient, not simply an acceptable compromise, and this would apply to Approach 3 below as well.</li>
</ul>
<h3><b>A priceless example</b></h3>
<div>
<p>The Priceless tagline / proposition for MasterCard started off as a campaign but has more or less been woven into the fabric of the MasterCard brand as a permanent part of its identity. In general all credit card brands assert that when you pull out your credit card the brand name on it says something about who you are, and prestige often bordering ostentation is the traditional territory of the category. In contrast MasterCard&#8217;s agency developed this brilliant proposition:</p>
<p>&#8220;There are some things that money can&#8217;t buy. For everything else, there&#8217;s MasterCard&#8221;</p>
<p>The insight behind the campaign is that there are special moments in life, often serendipitous, usually shared with loved ones, that no amount of wealth could purchase. For a credit card brand (= access to money) to be dramatising this insight shows that the brand understands that there are more important things than itself. This implies that it is magnanimous, humble, and big-hearted, traits that many people would prefer to have associated with themselves. And besides the prestige can be communicated through the creative execution itself. It also taps into the post-80s/90s materialism sentiment that in fact luxury is at heart experiential, so it was and still is very much &#8220;of its time&#8221;. Copy lines never really work in isolation, and the high-end feel of the execution adds &#8220;luxury&#8221; attributes to MasterCard&#8217;s brand image.</p>
<div id="attachment_440" style="width: 833px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mastercard_Priceless_TVC_Campaign_Japan.jpg"><img class="wp-image-440 size-full" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mastercard_Priceless_TVC_Campaign_Japan.jpg" alt="&quot;There are some things that money can't buy. For everything else, there's Mastercard&quot; - Priceless Campaign localised to Japanese" width="823" height="288" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;There are some things that money can&#8217;t buy. For everything else, there&#8217;s Mastercard&#8221; &#8211; Priceless Campaign localised to Japanese</p></div>
<p>The creative device evolved to become a very simple set up stating the price of an experience or thing, but then trumping it with an emotional outcome, which is “Priceless”. The simplicity of it is the hardest thing to adapt into Japanese, and actually this is always the case. The best copy lines or creative devices are sort of hacks of the language that manage to say something profound and impactful in a very simple way.</p>
<p>The only way to adapt this into Japanese AND retain the original meaning is to spell it out, but to find a copy line that does it in a relatively short and elegant way, and I believe they succeeded with “お金で買えない価値がある”, literally &#8220;there is value that cannot be bought with money”. MasterCard actually retain the English word “Priceless” as a branding device, more than because they assume their Japanese target would understand what it means. Many will not, but it becomes another branding device that adds value to the brand through repeated use.</p>
<h2><b>Approach 3: Transcreation of the Concept into the Japanese Culture &amp;Psyche</b></h2>
<ul>
<li>This approach aims to take the DNA of the idea, and find a way of bringing that core idea to life within the Japanese psyche or culture in full knowledge that this will take it away from the original meaning.</li>
<li>In terms of the creative development process it amounts to going back to the creative brief, rewriting that, effectively adapting that, and then starting afresh with the creative development working with Japanese planners and creatives.</li>
<li>At that point what makes it the same campaign? Just how far can you strip a campaign back before it becomes something different? In fact, how far can you strip a brand back before it becomes something different?</li>
<li>In its purest form the best creative briefs define the emotional response that you aim to elicit and empowers the creative process to press that button, which is always going to require language and culture-specific communications.</li>
<li>Since the emotional responses of humans are universal, a creative brief stated in these terms and accurately translated into local languages can be the bedrock for a brand that plays in the same emotional territory wherever it is advertised in the world.</li>
<li>To my mind this is the ideal approach since if a brand does not strike an emotional chord with people in a market, it will always be hobbled and less robust as a global brand because of it.</li>
<li>However, the stimuli that will elicit the same desired emotional response will differ culture by culture, potentially target segment by segment too. This fact alone goes a long way to explaining why adapting brand strategies to multiple markets is such a tricky process.</li>
<li>Usually you do not have or in fact are not able to strip a campaign concept to such bare essentials, for various reasons. For instance, the global client just does not have the bandwidth to get into the conceptual nuances in foreign markets. It is, after all, just one of many they have to manage. It is certainly true to say that the more they trust their local brand and agency teams, the more likely they are to allow the brand to be transcreated.</li>
</ul>
<h3><b>Semantic Ambiguity</b></h3>
<p>One of the things you learn from working in the adaptation and transcreation areas a lot is that really good copy in any language leverages ambiguities implied by the choice of words to claim as broad an emotional relevance as possible while still “feeling&#8221; sharp and precise.</p>
<p>A good example that is close to my own heart is for the brand Indeed, the world’s biggest job search site, and adapting its global brand platform “How the World Works” into Japanese for its Japan market launch campaign, developed by our colleagues at MullenLowe in Boston.</p>
<p>The genius of this tag line in English is that it is a familiar expression that implies wisdom and knowledge of a complex human system, but by matching it to the context of recruitment sets up a double entendre with its literal meaning of how people find work, which is of course the raison d’être of the Indeed brand. The sharpest of communication strategists among you will have noted that this is an inherently flexible device since it says “we know how the world of employment works&#8221;, and, by inference, how to get you the right job, or to the companies recruiting the right candidates, but it does not say what that “How” is. The “how” comes in via the creative.</p>
<p>With the Japan launch of Indeed in 2015 the &#8220;How the World Works” campaign, which doubles as a brand tagline, was transcreated to carry a similarly powerful emotional evocation: 「その仕事が、世界を動かす」which back-translated says, “work that moves the world”. Brand positioning connoisseurs will have already noted that the savviness double-entendre is not retained in this transcreation, and instead emphasises what is more emotive connotation to Japanese people, the idea that your work has a higher purpose in the societal sense &#8211; a core brand value for the Indeed, although one that is not made explicit in its English tagline. If there is an intended ambiguity, it is in the way that 「世界」in Japanese can been both “your world” and “the World”, which was exactly the range of mental scales that we want the brand to transcend.</p>
<p>As someone who works across Japanese and English everyday, I am tempted to believe that the Japanese language, because of the unique way it has evolved as a sequence of assimilations of foreign languages, is extraordinarily flexible in the options it gives copywriters to play with, an unprovable theory that I intend to explore in a future post.</p>
<h2><b>Approach 4: Stratified brand platforms</b></h2>
<div>
<p>Is there a 4th approach? Actually, I think there is. It is where the international brand’s communications are stratified into global creative, usually in the approach 1 or 2 adaptation approach, usually projected through traditional media like TV. But then in other “high touch” channels like social, digital engagement and event-based promotions, the approach is closer to approach 3), being highly contextualised. This is often also very pragmatic given the centralised structure of many global brands, since seeing the same TV ads go out in all markets is very reassuring to those brand stakeholders who are not necessarily engaged in the nuances of international market cultures, but allows the freedom to the more ‘under the radar&#8217;.</p>
<p>A good example of this hybrid approach is RedBull, at least for the first few years after they launched in Japan, when they ran the global “Gives you wings” animated TV creative but simultaneously built out their extreme-sports &amp; music-based engagement programs. It is my impression (I am not a RedBull expert) that now as a mature brand in Japan they have dropped the &#8220;gives you wings” TV work and have built out their extreme sports and music platforms into the dominant local brand-building platform, and very effective it is too.</p>
<div id="attachment_454" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/RedBull_sumo.jpg"><img class="wp-image-454 size-medium" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/RedBull_sumo-300x200.jpg" alt="Red Bull" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photographer Credit: Jason Halayko/Red Bull Content Pool</p></div>
<h2><b>Idealism vs Pragmatism: what is the true path?</b></h2>
<div>Ultimately I do not believe there is a single “right way” since brands exist in the real world where budgets and mental bandwidth can be constrained, and so I can accept that any of the 4 approaches above could actually be the correct choice for the organisational context in which the decision is made, and all of them can work. But from the point of view of someone like me who loves to help brands resonate, flourish and become the transcultural conduits of fresh ideas and compelling propositions, approach 3 is the most exciting to be part of.</div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/the-art-of-localising-brands-japan/">The Art of Localising Brands to Japan</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/the-art-of-localising-brands-japan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How good is Japanese customer service, and how bad can it get?</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/good-japanese-customer-service-bad-can-get/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/good-japanese-customer-service-bad-can-get/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan's future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid corporates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid teams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Japan has, I believe, a good image for customer service and I have certainly had numerous conversations over the years with foreigners visiting Japan who have been blown away by the attention to detail, courtesy as well as genuine human kindness. Some of the traditions that set Japan apart are things like beautiful and meticulous [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/good-japanese-customer-service-bad-can-get/">How good is Japanese customer service, and how bad can it get?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?--></p>
<div>
<div id="attachment_418" style="width: 650px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/JapaneseGiftWrapping_B+W.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-418" alt="A cylindrical gift is wrapped beautifully" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/JapaneseGiftWrapping_B+W.jpg" width="640" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A cylindrical gift is wrapped beautifully in a Japanese department store</p></div>
</div>
<div>
<p>Japan has, I believe, a good image for customer service and I have certainly had numerous conversations over the years with foreigners visiting Japan who have been blown away by the attention to detail, courtesy as well as genuine human kindness.</p>
<p>Some of the traditions that set Japan apart are things like beautiful and meticulous gift wrapping in retail stores, similarly delicate presentation of food in restaurants, cleanliness in general,  things running on time, and on a higher level safety and reliability.</p>
<p>At the same time I have heard many anecdotes, mostly from foreign residents in Japan, but also sometimes from visitors, telling of mind bogglingly annoying treatment.</p>
<p>What’s going on here? Is this another one of Japan’s “contradictions”?</p>
<h1>Japanese cultural stereotypes</h1>
<p>This topic will get very cloudy very quickly if I do not focus it a bit more. Some of the examples I mentioned in the first paragraph are intertwined with public service investment policy and regulation that I am not qualified to go into. What I want to focus on instead, even though I am not exactly qualified in this area either, is the human end of it. People delivering customer service. Even with this focus the threads of arguments can quickly get intertwined with more complex national issues like how the education system works, but I will try to steer away from too many sweeping generalisations.</p>
<p>There is an ever so slightly derogatory Japanese word for theorising about Japanese people and what makes them different. It is called NIHON-JIN-RON, and in general I try to steer clear from it, since there is so much tripe written in the genre, and it can get borderline racist. In this case though I need to flirt with it in order to get anywhere near the heart of the question, and besides Japanese people actually love it when they hear that they are different and unique. I apologise in advance for any offence caused and would welcome being put right in public e.g. via <a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-admin/post-new.php">my twitter account @jameshollow</a>.</p>
<p>Apologies done, first of all let’s try to define the right conditions that can deliver the ultimate in customer service. I would argue the following ingredients are key:<br />
&#8211; rigorous training regime based on high standards<br />
&#8211; staff with pride in their work, want to do their bit<br />
&#8211; knows their company / product really well<br />
&#8211; access to personal information (either their own memory or access to data)<br />
&#8211; empowered individuals, prepared to make own decisions<br />
&#8211; creative / think on their feet to work out bespoke approach<br />
&#8211; empowered to work around / bend rules if circumstances demand</p>
<p>I suspect that the first 3 conditions are met more often in Japan than say my native UK, hence people’s pleasant surprise in general with service quality when they come and stay here. Overall I suspect the average level of care is higher.</p>
<h2>Incremental improvement of service?</h2>
<p>In the same way that Japanese manufacturers have used detail-oriented management processes to constantly improve quality and reliability, so service brands have applied similar practices to hone their care, and hence general standards of care and support are high. A first hand example of this is the difference between JAL and BA cabin crew. You can share a joke in the galley far more readily with a BA crew member, but having flown with young kids on both airlines, the JAL crew were obviously trained on the essentials of caring for a family with young kids far better. There was no comparison.</p>
<p>I also believe that although not absolute, Japanese people are a little bit happier in a role that serves others, because it feels like they are doing their bit for society, and in Japan values are a little bit more tilted towards serving society than serving yourself.</p>
<p>For the 3rd point about knowing your product better, the more stable job market in Japan that meant people stayed with the same employer for longer may in the past have conferred an advantage here, but today with the contract working structure I am not sure there is anything to call out here other than perhaps training again.</p>
<p>I would though point out that training works both ways. Japanese people are used to absorbing lots of information from a young age, so their ability to suck up detailed product information and protocols may well be higher. I suspect they are less likely to challenge the principles behind them as well.</p>
<h2>The Japanese customer service fail</h2>
<p>The last 3 criteria though explain why Japan often finds it hard to deliver really really special customer service, outside the family run hotels and restaurants where as owners the service providers are more empowered.</p>
<p>Japanese employees I would say are less empowered to make decisions for themselves, more afraid of the potential consequences of breaking the rules or doing something differently, and not just for themselves, (a type of thoughtfulness in itself, but one that may not help the individual guest they are serving), and hence unable to make people feel ultimately special.</p>
<p>Taking the UK as the counterpoint, I guess the first 3 criteria are on average less often met, but if they are the last 3 are more possible than in Japan.</p>
<p>America for its part is renowned for encouraging the extremes, serving up the best in the world and the worst in equal measure. The statistical Bell curves for most things tend to be broader in diverse America than the tighter clustering around the average in homogenous Japan, whether its for height, education standards or I suspect customer service.</p>
<p>Japan can deliver dire service too however, but I suspect it is of a slightly different kind, not rooted in pure sloppiness but instead in inflexibility. The relatively tighter training combined with the customer service provider’s frequent inability to think for themselves (while at work anyway) can lead to some terrible experiences, and I believe there is a particular type of fail that annoys us long term residents most because we know where it stems from.</p>
<p>A nice example I heard recently was from an Italian friend who runs a luxury watch importer. He was taking his extended family out to a restaurant, an Italian no less, as he concedes the Italian cuisine in Tokyo is pretty damn good. He had a booking from 7pm and arrived with his large group 5mins early in light rain. At the door he could see the empty table reserved and prepared for them, since it was the only one big enough to seat them. The waiter though would not let them in the door until 7pm, since that was when they booked from. My Italian friend was literally pulling his hair out as he recounted this experience, so I can only imagine the earful he gave the waiter. “If that happened in Italy, I tell you…” I doubt it made much difference though.</p>
<p>I have heard enough stories like this over the years now to have a label for them: “the does-not-compute fail”. It’s a bit like the frustrations you suffer when you present a slightly uncommon set of circumstances to any hard wired operating system, only the option of “wait and speak to the operator” is not available and even then escalation may be fruitless. It’s caused by the dutiful member of staff following a set of rules or regulations to the letter without feeling any sense of empowerment to interpret them in the spirit in which they were intended, or empathy with guest’s discomfort or frustration for that matter. Although you could also call it a failure of the training regime too.</p>
<p>It is not just in customer care that this trait can treat is head. I have heard from numerous sources, both anecdotally from friends working in the field and more officially in reports that the safety regime in the Fukushima Dai-ichi suffered from this kind of vulnerability, so the results of this kind of auto-piloting are not always trivial.</p>
<p>In the same way that it is certainly not true to say that western companies don’t get the training bit right, since many do, it is not true that no Japanese customer service professionals do not have the wherewithal or charisma to make things happen for their customers. Many do, but there a relatively fewer of them I bet.</p>
<h2>Hybrid brand cultures as the ideal?</h2>
<p>The interesting question is what happens when you blend corporate cultures and the different balances of personality types you get between Japan and other markets, as <a title="Renault-Nissan Alliance is the pathfinder corporate hybrid and can overtake Toyota" href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/renault-nissan-alliance-is-the-pathfinder-corporate-hybrid/">NISSAN and Renault have attempted to do with their alliance discussed here</a>. I have also written before about the Japan hybrid at a cultural level in the context of the <a title="Brasil x Japan: the ideal hybrid?" href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/brasil-japan-ideal-hybrid/">Japan x Brazil hybrid</a> as being a particularly interesting one, but there are many more being explored today.</p>
<p>In fact this is something that Japanese service brands are exploring with increasing vigour as they finally dig into their enormous cash stock piles and expand their operations overseas, and threaten to steel the mantel of Japan Inc from the Japanese maker brands.</p>
<p>One notable area of service brands which were relatively quick of the blocks in this are the Japanese convenience store chains like 7eleven, Lawson and FamilyMart. They are applying their processes for training staff in customer service, also hygienic practices when serving food, areas which give them a competitive quality advantage in many Asia countries. Combined with best practices in logistics management and other infrastructure they are expanding rapidly in Asia, already boasting over 50k stores between them outside Japan.</p>
<p>Another brand trying to do something similar, only with a bit more fashion sense, is UNIQLO, the phenomenally successful Japanese fashion retailer, dubbed the ZARA of Japan. They have massive plans for growing out a chain of stores across the US and Europe, currently growing at 50% YoY, and have at the heart of their strategy, to complement their innovative fabric technologies, a Japanese level and style of in-store etiquette to charm their customers.</p>
<p>UNIQLO believes in this as a USP to such an extent that they are flying store managers from Europe and the US back to Japan to be trained in a Japanese store. The idea of handing a customer’s credit card back to them with two hands, a little bow and a “let me return your card madam” may sound old fashioned, but it might just be the next big thing in retailing.</p>
<h2>Service brands as Japan&#8217;s biggest export</h2>
<p>Although manufacturing remains Japan’s biggest export, I expect to see more Japanese service brands picking up the slack. There is a lot of intent out there in M&amp;A space to back this up, with the likes of Softbank, JapanPost, KuroNeko (Black Cat) logistics, RECRUIT and many more buying into foreign markets.</p>
<p>And of course Japan is now getting an influx of tourists like it has never seen before. Although the growth is coming from everywhere, the numbers are dominated by visitors from Taiwan, China, SE Asia and other Asian countries, so it will be challenged to show off its warm hearted neighbourliness like never before.</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/good-japanese-customer-service-bad-can-get/">How good is Japanese customer service, and how bad can it get?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/good-japanese-customer-service-bad-can-get/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 5: Otaku Culture Hack</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-5-otaku-culture/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-5-otaku-culture/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid corporates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profero Tokyo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The  fifth post in my “becoming a creative hybrid memoirs” series, describing my experiences growing Alien-Eye, a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers a period from 2008~11 or so, and explains the success of a long running campaign that hacked into a rich vein of Japanese culture on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-5-otaku-culture/">Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 5: Otaku Culture Hack</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  fifth post in my “becoming a creative hybrid memoirs” series, describing my experiences growing Alien-Eye, a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers a period from 2008~11 or so, and explains the success of a long running campaign that hacked into a rich vein of Japanese culture on behalf of an international technology brand.</p>
<p>The entire <a href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/category/memoirs/">“Tokyo Memoirs”</a> series is collected here.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Our next big endeavor led to our biggest &#8220;culture hack&#8221; to date, where we tapped into a deep furrow of Japanese entertainment culture, to rejuvenate a tiring brand in the Japanese market place, helping it reclaim top spot in an increasingly crowded market place.</p>
<div id="attachment_296" style="width: 950px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/nortonfighter_jameshollowcom_b+w.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-296" alt="Norton Fighter" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/nortonfighter_jameshollowcom_b+w.jpg" width="940" height="530" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Norton Fighter was a product of hybrid culture</p></div>
<p>Norton, the security software company, had been a pioneer in the first mass era of personal computing, and had enjoyed a cash-cow business in Japan&#8217;s security-conscious market alongside the explosion of the Windows platform for over a decade.</p>
<p>However, by the time we were introduced to them at the end of 2007 it had found itself crowded in by local rivals with products that could claim to do the same thing (at least in the eyes of the average PC owner), and more agile, local marketing strategies, and their revenues were hurting as a result. Having previously relied on a combination of traditional media-based brand salience combined with boring descriptions of product functionality at the point of sale, they needed a communication platform that could capture attention and increase relevance with Japanese audiences.</p>
<h2><b>A passionate hybrid team</b></h2>
<p>Inspired by a smart and charismatic client, Anton van Deth, who believed that even security software could be a compelling product category, despite what most people including many in his own team, we set out to set up a totally new communication paradigm through which to engage consumers around Norton’s product benefits.</p>
<p>Combining with a team of local character designers led by one of Japan’s top character design and toy model gurus, Don Kratzer (<a href="http://fig-lab.com/">fig-lab</a>), and in cahoots with an awesome development team led by Vince Ota, we worked to develop a multi-channel campaign centred around a hero character that played off the hugely successful 1970&#8217;s Ultraman style TV  hero show genre called “tokusatsu”. Tokusatsu means &#8220;special effects” in Japanese because of all the latex costumes and pyro-technics the low budget TV shows used, and it provided a rich seam of stylistic references for our creative executions.</p>
<h2><b>Inventing a communication paradigm</b></h2>
<p>Starting as an stunt style event outside the World’s biggest electronics retail store in Akihabara, we quickly set about recasting Norton&#8217;s entire product efficacy communications within the good-versus-evil storytelling paradigm, broken up into an episodic structure. True to the original genre, a central superhero character was developed, “Norton Fighter”, who was a cross between a Japanese tokusatsu style “guy in a mask and lycra suit” with a more macho American comic hero like Captain America.</p>
<p>Also just like in the original TV shows behind the lead hero character was his scientist inventors. Together they fought against monster characters (think guys in crazy monster costumes) that were based on the hitherto intangible plethora of malware threats such as viruses, trojan horses, botnets and the like, we were able to create fun, compelling dramatizations of their product story in basically any communication touchpoint, from point of sale tools to online games, TV ads to OOH.</p>
<p>That was the strategy anyway, but it still had to be executed creatively and rolled out to channels, and done in a way that built credibility and relevance with local stakeholders and customers.</p>
<h2><b>Engaging key audiences</b></h2>
<p>Key to the success of this roll out was engaging Japan&#8217;s influential &#8216;otaku&#8217; community, the nerdy computer geeks who play a critical role in defining the credibility and reputation of computer related products. Largely oblivious to international brands and unaffected by mainstream media campaigns, this community had to be engaged on their own terms and on their own turf, and within a cultural space that resonated with them.</p>
<p>The answer was &#8220;hero-shows&#8221;, live shows that re-enact iconic battles between the heroes and monsters of the TV series, usually incorporating stylized fighting scenes and tokusatsu weaponry. Hence we began by running hero-shows outside the electronic stores in the districts of Tokyo and Osaka synonymous with the otaku culture, namely Akihabara and Osaka’s equivalent. For one event that created a lot of buzz online we combined the hero show with a otaku idol group, Marvel Parfait. All of these events were captured on video and seeded on Mixi and tech influencer blogs where they attracted some notoriety.</p>
<p>In concert with the events we shot mini-episodes depicting a battle between Norton Fighter and one of his arch enemies, in a style that paid homage to the original 70&#8217;s style with low-fi effects. Incidentally the first of these videos was picked up by the big American tech blogs like engadget and TechCrunch, marking the first time Norton had been featured in the new breed tech-news sites, with most commentators expressing surprise and delight that such a typically conservative tech brand like Norton was doing something interesting. This put us and our activities in the spotlight within Norton global, and meant that incremental budgets could keep flowing.</p>
<div id="attachment_305" style="width: 817px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a title="Watch the first episode here" href="http://youtu.be/Cj3ihO016p4" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-305" alt="Norton Fighter takes on Botlas" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/NortonFighter_vs_Botlas_theViral_B+W2.png" width="807" height="487" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Norton Fighter takes on Botlas, the Botnet lord</p></div>
<h2><b>Paying homage to a genre</b></h2>
<p>From a creative execution point of view, we were very conscious of the potential risk of playing with such a treasured creative genre, as tokusatsu is in Japan. Do it well, and the foreign brand can be embraced by local audiences unlike ever before. But if you fail to do justice to the local creative genre you will lose credibility not gain it, and risk rejection from those who were previously merely indifferent.</p>
<p>As an example of the attention to detail that was applied, Don, who led the development of the all-important monster characters, would call creative strategy meetings to decide on the names of these web villains. For instance, the Trojan Horse genre of internet threats was represented by a mechanical horse-like character named “mokubakuba”, and he laboriously researched monster characters from the original TV shows.</p>
<p>Similarly Dicky, my co-founder at Alien-Eye, and lead video director, knew he had to get lots of details in the videos just right and so watched over 100 hours of original 70&#8217;s hero shows before he felt confident enough to direct something that could fit into the genre. But at the same time we could not simply ape the original genre. We had to take it somewhere new, and we did this by building in the brand values of the American software brand, making the hero character much more buff and hulk-like than the Japanese heroes would be, and using contemporary video effects to complement some of the old analogue techniques we employed.</p>
<p>I will never forget visiting the studio of the craftsmen that developed Don’s team&#8217;s designs into larger-than-life latex wonders. These guys had been working on tokusatsu costumes for decades, and more recently scale models for sci-fi movies, so their studio was an Aladdin’s cave of the weird and wonderful. We spent large chunks of the budget on these costumes, and much of the story development that took place over several years was driven by the costume production timeline.</p>
<h2><b>Extending reach through multiple channels</b></h2>
<p>In another medium, Don transformed the typical product pamphlet placed in the point of sale into a reprise of a tokusatsu fan comic magazine. Here the dry-as-a-bone technical spec sheet was replaced by manga dramatisations of the videos, product benefit statements into character profiles, with Norton’s cutting edge security technologies called out as the latest weaponry developed by the science team.</p>
<p>Having established the credibility of the our hero character in this way, the campaign was extended to mainstream channels with TV commercials, OOH and station media, and even a 25m high inflatable balloon of the hero character that was placed outside Japan biggest gaming event Tokyo Game Show. The buzz and awareness this created shifted sales to the extent that the brand reclaimed the #1 share of the category spot from its local rival, despite being significantly outspent both in media and in the retail channel.</p>
<p>One of the most interesting factors within this was the fact that for the first time the shop clerks who work the software floors of the big electronics chains, who are very much affected by what is being written in the otaku forums and blogs, started talking to customers about the hero character and explaining the campaign to them, being advocates for the brand for the first time.</p>
<div style="width: 488px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://www.loftwork.com/portfolios/mannaxxx/profile"><img title="An early illustration of Norton Fighter and his enemies" alt="Norton Fighter battled these " src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/NortonFighter_Monsters_B+w.jpg" width="478" height="567" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Design credit to Masako Mori, Direction to Fig-Lab</p></div>
<h2><b>Daring to be original</b></h2>
<p>As we learned in many other ambitious campaigns we took on as well, effects like this showed us that if you set out to do something original and do it with creative honesty and integrity, all kinds of positive secondary effects spring up that you would never have been able to imagine at the outset and which help you make it a success. “You make your own luck” as they say.</p>
<p>And also as with other campaigns where we broke new ground in Japan, we started to see other brands with more money referencing our work, trying to come up with their own “culture hack” approach to gaining notoriety in Japan, not least Nike with their Akiba x tokusatsu viral, which actually seemed to get more attention outside of Japan. That may have been the intention from the start, since Japan’s culture has so much depth and authenticity to tap into, this too would be a valid strategy.</p>
<p>In the lecture series I have run on growth hacking since we wrapped up this multi-year break through campaign I reference it as an example of the culture hack as a way of gaining brand notoriety and scale. Technology brands tend to be obsessed with technology hacks for growth, and they should be. But they often forget that ideas are still more scalable than technologies, and that brands can leverage cultural genre in order to make themselves more accessible and interesting. With ever-growing competition among online services in particular, brands that can hack into an existing culture and create something novel out of it can enjoy very powerful effects.</p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Read more from my <a href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/category/memoirs/">“Tokyo Memoirs”</a> series here.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-5-otaku-culture/">Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 5: Otaku Culture Hack</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-5-otaku-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cognition as a Service &#8211; a new Hybrid Technology</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/cognition-hybrid-technology/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/cognition-hybrid-technology/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an article I co-wrote with Dudu Noy last December for a &#8220;coming in 2014&#8243; guest post. Dudu is the CMO of Israeli language technology company, Ginger Software, which my company represents in the Japanese market (Ginger Japan website). So far the prediction has proved very prescient. Ginger has developed a super-smart hybrid technology [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/cognition-hybrid-technology/">Cognition as a Service &#8211; a new Hybrid Technology</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an article I co-wrote with Dudu Noy last December for a &#8220;coming in 2014&#8243; guest post. Dudu is the CMO of Israeli language technology company, <a href="http://gingersoftware.com">Ginger Software</a>, which my company represents in the Japanese market (<a href="http://getginger.jp">Ginger Japan website</a>). So far the prediction has proved very prescient.</p>
<p>Ginger has developed a super-smart hybrid technology that combines NLP and statistical algorithms to process all the English that is out there on the web, and using this enormous corpus as a reference, corrects non-native English as the user types.</p>
<p>Like Japan, Hebrew-speaking Israel is an island nation in terms of language, and so they have similar challenges when it comes to communicating in English. They also have one of the most fervent technology development cultures on the planet. Ginger is a product of that context, and I believe is a ground-breaking technology that has the potential to lower the language boundaries between cultures globally through supporting accurate and expressive communication in English.</p>
<p>Ginger&#8217;s take on cognition is just one area of this burgeoning field, and the article discusses the bigger picture, as well as explaining more about Ginger&#8217;s approach to it.</p>
<p>The article first appeared in one of Japan&#8217;s leading tech news sites, <a href="http://thebridge.jp/en/">The Bridge</a>, in December 2013 in <a href="http://thebridge.jp/en/2013/12/cognition-as-a-service">English</a> and <a href="http://thebridge.jp/2013/12/dudunoy-ginger">Japanese</a>, where naturally, as my client, Dudu got the credit. The main audience was Japanese, so a bit more effort went into the Japanese script, and I have rewritten some of the more awkward phrasing for the English version below.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">************</p>
<h1 style="text-align: left">Cognition-as-a-Service will come of age in 2014</h1>
<p><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Cognitin-as-a-service-cloud-computing-image-b+w.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-251" alt="Cognitin as a service - cloud computing image -b+w" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Cognitin-as-a-service-cloud-computing-image-b+w.jpg" width="1000" height="665" /></a></p>
<p>Here at Ginger we are predicting that 2014 will be remembered as the year that CaaS, or “Cognition-as-a-Service” platforms came of age. Cognition is historically a complex biological trait including skills such as decision making, problem solving, learning, reasoning, working memory and not least language, skills that today the computer sciences are chipping away at from various angles.</p>
<p>With each major evolutionary step in computing we have seen over the last 30 years, from mainframes to PCs, the internet, cloud and SaaS, and now ubiquitous smart mobile, the new realm has not so much replaced but augmented what was there before.</p>
<p>In the same way the promise of CaaS is to allow apps and services to function more intelligently and intuitively, allowing you to converse with them, ask questions, give commands and complete tasks more efficiently and conveniently.</p>
<p>Apple’s Siri is one of the most famous cognition-based services in general use today. And now Google’s recent innovations to its search product for mobile, incorporating more contextual conversation for queries, pits Google&#8217;s AI technology against Siri in the cognition-augmented search arena. In both cases, most of the technology itself is in the cloud, even though the device is in the user’s hand. Their main functions only work when there is an internet connection.</p>
<h2>Natural Language Processing</h2>
<p>The reason for this is that the two necessary tricks to make sense of a user’s speech input – speech recognition and natural language processing (NLP) – require cloud-based servers performing intensive processing of proprietary algorithms, and these processes are beyond the capabilities of handheld technology.</p>
<p>NLP-type processing is so intensive because of the sheer diversity and complexity comprised by a language like English. Old school NLP solutions were based on rigid rules that map inputs to a big list of known inputs. But the list can never be long enough, and the hard rules can never cover all the edge cases that appear naturally in language. This is why the experience of talking to a supposedly “smart assistant” has so far always left the user frustrated and feeling misunderstood, since they have up until recently been built using the hard wired rule-based approach.</p>
<p>You need more powerful, agile technologies that can figure out that in a sentence such as: “<i>Yuko wants to eat an apple</i>”, Yuko is something that can have wants, and can eat things, and that apples are things that can be eaten. The technology needs to be able to do this for the vast majority of sentences the app is likely to encounter. This is incredibly hard, but here at Ginger and a few other places, we are doing it.</p>
<h2>The &#8220;Platform Model&#8221;</h2>
<p>It is not just Apple and Google who are eyeing this new technology realm. IBM is now also a player with Watson, recently announcing that the same supercomputer-strength software that conquered the quiz show “Jeopardy!”, will be available to app developers through an API and software toolkit. This will allow cognitive apps that leverage cognition to be hosted in the cloud on Watson. This would obviously be a great thing for IBM’s cloud hosting service as well.</p>
<p>This “platform model” in tech business is nothing new of course. In recent years IBM did this with its Websphere application server technology, which went from an internal project to a software community of thousands of developers. Salesforce.com did this with its Force cloud-app development platform, as did Amazon with Amazon Web Services.</p>
<p>But what is different with CaaS platforms is that cognitive powers will be baked in to the operating system, and all the apps that are developed on that platform. That will bring intelligence to a mass public in a wide variety of as yet unimagined contexts.</p>
<h2>Gingers Approach to Cognition</h2>
<p>At Ginger we have not opened up our technology as a platform via an API yet, but we are already providing the benefits of its cognitive powers to a mass user base globally. Our technology uses statistical algorithms in conjunction with natural language processing, referencing a vast database of trillions of English sentences that have been scoured from the web. This allows us to work out what the users of our applications are trying to communicate, be it in Microsoft Office apps, Gmail, Facebook or anywhere else for that matter, and correct their mistakes and suggest improvements to their expressions.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure – this is a really interesting space to work, and it will be fun to see where computer based cognition will go in 2014.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/cognition-hybrid-technology/">Cognition as a Service &#8211; a new Hybrid Technology</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/cognition-hybrid-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 4: Blog Culture Hack</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-4-blog-culture-hack/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-4-blog-culture-hack/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 03:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nurturing innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The fourth post in my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid memoirs&#8221; series, describing my experiences growing Alien-Eye, a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers the period from 2008~09 or so, and describes the microblogging boom that exploded around that time and some of our exploits with it. The entire [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-4-blog-culture-hack/">Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 4: Blog Culture Hack</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_270" style="width: 359px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/iTunes_BlogParts_MusicGenre_B+W.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-270" alt="iTunes BlogParts technology hack" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/iTunes_BlogParts_MusicGenre_B+W.png" width="349" height="347" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The customisable &#8220;iTunes Blog Parts&#8221;</p></div>
<p>The fourth post in my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid memoirs&#8221; series, describing my experiences growing Alien-Eye, a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers the period from 2008~09 or so, and describes the microblogging boom that exploded around that time and some of our exploits with it.</p>
<p>The entire <a href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/category/memoirs/">&#8220;Tokyo Memoirs&#8221;</a> series is collected here.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>With the novelty of Mixi peaking out, the next big wave to hit the Japanese web was the micro-blogging boom around 2008 to 2010 that  made Japanese the most blogged language on the planet for a while. During this time everyone who wanted to be with it and online had a blog, It was a lifestyle accessory.</p>
<p>Although blogs had been around since the 90&#8217;s, they were now not just for geeks but for anyone who was brave enough to stick their head up above the parapet of Mixi&#8217;s anonymity and declare their lives open to the public (although many of the blogs were also anonymous), and web giants like CyberAgent grew off the back of new blogging platforms that for the first time pulled in celebrities from traditional media, such as magazine models and TV talents.</p>
<p>It was significant, not least because Facebook would not have succeeded in Japan if the microblogging boom had not broken down the “closed-ness” of Mixi. Facebook also likely benefited from the blog-weariness that followed the blogging bubble.</p>
<h1>iTunes meets Japan&#8217;s blogosphere</h1>
<p>During this time we had started working with the iTunes division of Apple in Japan, who were looking to grow their music downloads business rapidly, and later apps. They had already got their catalogue of Japanese artists up to critical mass, but perception lagged behind and most people saw them either as software for ripping rental CDs, or rightly more as a store, but one that only had foreign artists, hard as that is to imagine now. This time the solution was a technology hack, but one that played very much of the design iconography of the early iPod series, as well as blog-fashion consciousness of the times.</p>
<p>One of the strongest drivers of the blogging boom was the culture around styling your blog with the right colors, characters, favourite brands and accessorizing with blogparts, since so many of the blogs of this time were lifestyle accessories, rather than a medium for sharing experiences, ideas of opinion. Known outside of Japan as &#8220;widgets&#8221; blogparts were the focus of a lot of attention for a while, with media sites ranking and reviewing them and media spends promoting branded blogparts.</p>
<p>Our solution was to suck the chart data out of the music store via the RSS feeds and insert it into customisable blogparts that were designed to look as similar as possible to the iPod Mini, and later the iPod Nano series.</p>
<p>Crucial to their popularity was to allow them to be customised to the style and tastes of the host blog. Firstly the colour could be chosen from among the official iPod colours. Similarly the chart genre could be picked from among a dozen genres, from JPop to HipHop, meaning that the look and musical taste of any blogger could be satisfied.</p>
<h2>Designed to scale</h2>
<p>In general this approach, essentially a product range strategy, of creating a line up that is consistent in form and hence recognisable as part of the lineup, but customisable in the details, is a real winner in the consumer psychology of Japan. It is for instance the cornerstone of UNIQLO’s success. They popularise a line of clothes that are identical in all but colour, but then make 20 subtly different colour varieties of it. This allows consumers to buy into the same look as everyone else, while feeling that they have made a unique choice.</p>
<p>Our blogparts were really right for their time and place, a blogging culture hack that had the Apple brand behind them, so we knew if we got them in front of the right people they would soon take off. First we promoted them through the blogpart ranking sites, with both media and editorial placement. We also ran highly targeted banners that featured on the blog update confirmation page on major blogging platforms like Ameba and LiveDoor. We also did some seeding with music influencers who had blogs, but only a handful.</p>
<p>They quickly took off and within the space of 6months were on the blogs of 15k music scene influencers and fans, and had huge UU and PV counts every month. In fact, the Google Analytics tracking code we had in those blogparts gave us so much interesting insights into the blogging culture.</p>
<p>With such broad visibility among the digitally savvy music scene the solution played an important role in shifting perception of the store&#8217;s catalogue as well as channeling a lot of users to the store, and all this for a pretty insignificant development cost upfront and then modest hosting fees every month.</p>
<p>Digital music downloads have long been dominated by downloads to mobile devices, and these revenues were all controlled by the carriers. So although iTunes was always growing in Japan its inflection point was of course the arrival of the iPhone, and carriers have not had it quite so easy ever since. Although the App Store was around before the iPhone launched in Japan for the benefit of iPods, again it was the iPhone that made it take off.</p>
<p>So our blogparts were also plugged into the App Store chart rankings RSS feeds, and away they went driving millions more impressions on a different set of blogs for virtually no extra cost.</p>
<p>The widgets were initially built in Flash, and worked just fine, but after a couple of years of garnering millions and millions of free impressions every month for the iTunes Store and its products we were told that Flash could no longer exist in the Apple ecosystem. So we had to rebuild them in HTML5 in about a month, and we did, and it made us pioneers in Japan of this now near ubiquitous technology since it was not a necessity for anyone else.</p>
<h2>How big a can a widget be?</h2>
<p><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/iTunes_PartnerParts_Embedded_B+W.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-269" alt="iTunes_PartnerParts_Embedded_B+W" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/iTunes_PartnerParts_Embedded_B+W.png" width="1047" height="637" /></a></p>
<p>The blogparts also spawned a second bigger technology project which began when a small ISP portal site offered iTunes a tab on their portal in exchange for weekly updated content that would then fuel click-through purchase on the iTunesStore and hence affiliate revenue for the ISP portal. Building HTML pages every week was never our cup of tea, and besides would have been an inefficient investment for our client, so we hit on the idea of developing on top of the blog part engine to create fully automated main-column embeddable widget, and called it Partner Parts.</p>
<p>From the get go we saw Partner Parts as media product that could be used by multiple online distribution partners, from bigger portals to music community sites to web magazines, with minimal costs and total scaleability. Where the blogparts worked to distribute to the long tail of personal blogs, Partner Parts targeted the mid to high traffic site properties.</p>
<p>Unlike the blogparts, in order to work with multiple partners and for them to be able to customise their own widgets the system need to have an account structure and basic CMS, and a team to maintain them, and yes put them all in HTML5! I.e. more like a real web product.</p>
<p>We built this into a really solid solution, and got up to around 15 partners in Japan, and at one point we were in discussion with various Apple markets around the world to help them adopt the system. But the talk fizzled out and although we kept it going in Japan it never reached the scale we had hoped.</p>
<h1>When hybrid teams don&#8217;t work</h1>
<p>In retrospect I can connect the success of the iTunes Blogparts and the experience of trying to productise Partner Parts to the biggest blunder I have made in business. Their relative simplicity compared to the reach they were able to achieve gave me first hand experience of the scalability technology can give you, and a thirst to do it again, only bigger, and with the IP owned by us. I started trying to build out a development team within Alien-Eye, paid for by client projects, but aiming to build out our own products.</p>
<p>Of course the blogparts would have been nothing without the the massive content platform Apple had established with iTunes, its conviviality through the RSS feeds, and the momentum that the Apple brand had with early adopters consumers at that time, so it was in many ways a false lesson in instant scaleability. We were just joining a couple of dots within the realm of the brand.</p>
<p><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/iTunes_PartnerParts_CMS_B+W.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-267" alt="iTunes_PartnerParts_CMS_B+W" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/iTunes_PartnerParts_CMS_B+W.png" width="286" height="197" /></a></p>
<p>We were not the first digital agency to try to spin off a product, or pivot to a product strategy, and were not the last either, and while I am sure there are success stories, it seems to be a pretty hard thing to pull off. I believe having a hybrid team of technologists, marketing experts and project managers is actually pretty ideal, but they have to be focused on the same thing. To make the technology product you really need to be focused on it, and perhaps riding your luck on the marketing stuff leading up to making the transition, so you can get to a minimum viable product as quickly as possible then bite the bullet, fire your clients and get investment, not necessarily in that order. We lacked that focus, not least myself, and we also never found a leader for the development team, so the DNA of the company at the top was all marketing in background, and that makes it really hard to recruit, retain and have a technology vision to inspire and direct developers.</p>
<p>In the end the combination of the 2011 Touhoku earthquake and tsunami and a bubbly job market for developers in Japan at the same time brought about a mercifully swift end to the internal dev team experiment, but not before we had made some great mobile apps, social games and other projects I will be writing about in following episodes.</p>
<p>Incidentally now and Lowe Profero we have a couple of hundred developers in our office in Beijing doing development work for all the offices in the network, including ours. Having this kind of scale and competitive price advantage combined with quality assurance is the way to go.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-4-blog-culture-hack/">Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 4: Blog Culture Hack</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-4-blog-culture-hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why LINE is eating Facebook&#8217;s sushi lunch</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/line-vs-facebook-in-japan/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/line-vs-facebook-in-japan/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid corporates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an article I wrote for the industry journal &#8220;Marketing Interactive&#8221; in November 2013. Since WhatsApp was recently acquired by Facebook, and now goes head to head with LINE in the chat app race, it is good to be reminded of where LINE has come from, and what makes it so unique and adaptable. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/line-vs-facebook-in-japan/">Why LINE is eating Facebook&#8217;s sushi lunch</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an article I wrote for the industry journal &#8220;Marketing Interactive&#8221; in November 2013. Since WhatsApp was recently acquired by Facebook, and now goes head to head with LINE in the chat app race, it is good to be reminded of where LINE has come from, and what makes it so unique and adaptable.</p>
<p>The published article was much whittled down, and although it may be an easier read, it left out several of the more interesting cultural nuances that makes LINE so appealing, as well as its cultural-hybrid origins, so I have belatedly printed my original draft below.</p>
<p>The Marketing Interactive version can be seen <a href="http://www.marketing-interactive.com/japans-youth-turned-facebook-turning-line/">here</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_218" style="width: 382px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Facebook-vs-LINE-in-Japan-BW.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-218" alt="Facebook losing out to LINE in capturing Japanese youth" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Facebook-vs-LINE-in-Japan-BW.jpg" width="372" height="191" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Facebook losing out to LINE in capturing Japanese hearts</p></div>
<p>On the face of it Facebook have a lot to be smug about when looking at their Japanese footprint.</p>
<p>The original Japanese social network Mixi is in rapid decline, and Facebook now boasts 21m local active monthly users. This has grown rapidly from around four million a couple of years ago, with 86% of users on mobile compared to the global average of 71%. And what’s more Facebook announced in August that it was going to double its Japanese workforce to boost the local advertising business.</p>
<p>All this in a society that many said would never accept a service that does not allow its users to remain anonymous! It just shows how attitudes can change.</p>
<p>Facebook&#8217;s user profile is also ideal for many brands, mirroring the demographic bulge of Japan&#8217;s population that peaks around the late 30s. The children of the baby boomers are the sweet spot for many brands, and I for one do not see Facebook losing this strength any time soon.</p>
<p>However, exploring the digital landscape a little closer there are some worrying signs for Facebook. Some of which are the same concerns that are levelled everywhere, namely that it never worked out how to monetize mobile, and others which are uniquely Japanese in origin.</p>
<p>Primary among these is the explosive growth of the mobile chat app LINE. Inspired by the wake of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, or so the story goes, LINE has broken all records on the way to 250 million users globally, 43 million of who are in Japan. Underpinning this meteoric rise has been LINE&#8217;s cute UI and simple UX, which reduces to a minimum the number of taps required for all the basic social mobile operations, like adding friends, sharing photos with a selected group etc.</p>
<p>But what makes LINE stand out among the handful of other chat apps currently boasting these kind of user numbers, such as WhatsApp, Viber, and WeChat is its phenomenal ability to monetize its user base.</p>
<p>Unlike Facebook which is now more or less limited to advertising, LINE sells digital goods such as the &#8220;stamps&#8221; that its users converse with in the chat threads, as well as game credits. And it’s working. In the second quarter of 2013 LINE generated $100m in revenue. That&#8217;s one reason it’s a model that is starting to be mimicked by competitors across the globe.</p>
<p>For Japan’s users, who were raised on an image-rich diet of manga characters and anime, the stamps are the easiest and most charming way to express those everyday feelings that friends exchange. In fact they were designed exactly for that purpose, each one mapping to a commonly shared feeling like “I’m exhausted”, or “having fun!”, using 4 original LINE characters as the grammar of this visual language.</p>
<p>Starting with the default set of stamps, users can then buy new stamps for around $1.70 a pop, or else download free stamps from the sponsored gallery, in which brands pay for their own characters to be featured. Many of the stamps that Japanese users buy are manga characters from classic titles they read when they were growing up, so when shared among friends who all know the story and hence the context of the shared frame, the communications exchanged become nuanced with more subtle meaning and personality.</p>
<p>Contrast the layered richness of this communication with the “like” on Facebook, its often baffling privacy settings, and the fact that you have to mind what you post since your boss might have friended you, it is no wonder LINE is where friends prefer to hang out together.</p>
<p>LINE&#8217;s growth has so far largely come in East Asia where the same “high context, low content” culture predominates, but what is perhaps surprising is how popular it is proving elsewhere. It has jumped to 10 million users in India in the space of a couple of months having hired a top Bollywood actress as its ambassador, passing 15m users in Spain and is now targeting South America. It is likely to hit 300m users this year and there is talk of an imminent IPO.</p>
<p>Some of us wondered whether Japan, so long a hardware juggernaut and console gaming industry heavy hitter, would ever break its duck in the web services arena. In hindsight it makes total sense that it would take a mobile app with a uniquely visual UX that can be personalized to reflect the visual culture of its users, wherever they are, to have universal appeal.</p>
<p>Although made for Japan, it is an offshoot of a Korean company, NAVER, that realised they had already lost their home market to the chat app Kakao, and so targeted Japan, the closest next market, with a copycat that became LINE. Although late to the party, it is interesting that it is LINE that is now challenging the world, while Kakao is hardly in the running at a global level.</p>
<p>It is possible that by having to adapt the Korea-originated smart phone chat experience for Japan, a market that is similar but not identical to Korea in terms of mobile culture, gave LINE enough cultural flexibility to then make the jump to other markets, including beyond Asia. It almost certainly helped in terms of baking a cross cultural mindset into the culture of the company.</p>
<p>As smart phone adoption continues to grow exponentially around the world it is easy to imagine how a native app built around the universal appeal of emotive images, monetized through digital goods will continue to have Facebook&#8217;s sushi lunch from Tokyo to the ends of the earth.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/line-vs-facebook-in-japan/">Why LINE is eating Facebook&#8217;s sushi lunch</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/line-vs-facebook-in-japan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growth Hacking for brands and how to grow a hybrid team</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/growth-hacking-for-brands-and-how-to-grow-a-hybrid-team/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/growth-hacking-for-brands-and-how-to-grow-a-hybrid-team/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cultural diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid teams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nurturing innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profero Tokyo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was recently interviewed for a Japanese creative industry magazine &#8220;Project Design&#8221; to talk about the relevance of &#8220;Growth Hacking&#8221; (Japanese article here), the approach to growing web and mobile startups that has come to prominence in recent years, to established and non-web businesses. I was interviewed in Japanese, but wrote up the main threads of the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/growth-hacking-for-brands-and-how-to-grow-a-hybrid-team/">Growth Hacking for brands and how to grow a hybrid team</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_182" style="width: 302px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/GrowthHackingJapan-logo-B+W.png"><img class=" wp-image-182  " title="Growth Hacking Japan logo" alt="Growth Hacking Japan - a Profero Tokyo initiative" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/GrowthHackingJapan-logo-B+W.png" width="292" height="302" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">An initiative aimed at supporting international web / mobile brands grow in Japan, and developing Japanese growth hacking talent</p></div>
<p>I was recently interviewed for a Japanese creative industry magazine &#8220;Project Design&#8221; to talk about the relevance of &#8220;Growth Hacking&#8221; (<a href="http://www.projectdesign.jp/201401/growth-hacker/001011.php">Japanese article here</a>), the approach to growing web and mobile startups that has come to prominence in recent years, to established and non-web businesses. I was interviewed in Japanese, but wrote up the main threads of the conversation in English below.</p>
<p>First of all though some context. Why was I being interviewed about Growth Hacking? I have been a involved a lot with startups one way or another. I have had numerous startups as clients over the years, companies with a good product-market-fit for Japan for whom my company has effectively been the growth team <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="eccbde0b-c48a-4047-8c11-9d59db9902cc">for</span> the Japan market. <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="76b4a687-77f3-4eea-8265-924bcdbfe9a2">Also through</span> my role as a mentor for 500 Startups, Silicon Valley&#8217;s top accelerator program, where I offer advice to founders and growth hackers on how to grow in in particular, but anywhere for that matter. I also run Growth Hacking Japan University, a 7 week lecture course in Japanese that I have run twice now, and plan to run again soon, teaching growth hacking techniques and strategies to Japanese founders and aspiring growth hackers, and learning a lot from the participants at the same time.</p>
<p>Most of the time I work with bigger established brands, including cloud tech companies and web services, for whom <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="aca5dfb8-7f4e-407a-84d9-5b6f5799c301">we</span> (Profero Tokyo) position ourselves as &#8220;the performance engine&#8221; that drives incremental results in one or a combination of marketing areas. I would not describe this work as &#8220;growth hacking&#8221; per se, but being so focused on KPIs and striving to create operational efficiencies, actually the work has a lot in common with what a <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="7970f654-c9db-452d-a41e-963898fc074c">growth</span> team in a web startup would be doing, and this is <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="23c57103-6d5c-4025-8bb3-13dff7ace56c">recognised</span> by several of our client partners. <a href="http://www.gingersoftware.com/">Ginger-Software</a>, the disruptive native English writing technology, founded in Israel, is one brand for whom we fulfil this role in Japan.</p>
<p><span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="79747855-f374-4811-bff5-41881b84d2b6">At</span> Profero Tokyo we are very conscious of the hybrid <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="eace76cf-36db-4bc0-b36d-8e5c04687828">team we</span> bring to each brand partner, the skill sets that combine when our specialists work together to create additional value, both through coming up with ideas that cross disciplines, as well as synergies that drive efficiencies for our clients, and in this sense we have embraced the growth hacking philosophy.</p>
<p>Here are my notes from the interview:</p>
<p style="text-align: center">++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Growth hacking can inform the philosophy, techniques and most importantly the hybrid teams that established companies should bring to new business models.</p>
<h2>Growth hacking needs an agile environment</h2>
<p>The whole point of Growth Hacking is to grow a new business model as quickly as possible. That objective is shared by many established companies when they start a new business division or launch new products, so in <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="6175f99a-aac8-44e1-944c-73fa6dede7e2">principle there</span> is nothing stopping big companies from &#8220;growth hacking&#8221;. However, growth hacking works best in the purest sense when nothing is held sacred, allowing the product-market fit to be established without constraints, such as &#8220;brand XXX&#8217;s target <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="e98e6d5e-e126-41f8-8c2c-c42e12dedfa4">are</span> always <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="8b1e5d22-5472-4c9a-b11e-635c0e453e9d">YYYY type</span> of consumers&#8221;. Nurturing this sort of agility into the culture and environment of a big company is very hard to do, hence why companies tend to become less innovative as they get bigger.</p>
<p>One way of looking at what changes when you go from a <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="0c3fbc85-9395-4411-a946-5069c79821bc">small agile</span> startup to a big established company with many stakeholders, existing customers and partners, is to think in terms of where the efficiencies are coming from, since all business models need to be <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="67d0497e-d9f3-41ab-a396-fdbcbb630a44">creating</span> efficiencies of scale of some kind or another if they are to grow.</p>
<p>In small companies with very little baggage and a small cohesive team internal efficiencies should be off the chart, but because the business model has no scale yet in the market, it enjoys minimal external efficiencies. As companies grow and gain momentum in their <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="11fd2146-a3d1-40a6-8f9d-dee719e7629a">market they</span> go through a tipping point beyond which they have <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="a8da9830-aae0-406d-b656-f6fb94c072cb">broad awareness</span> among their audience, people know what to expect, they can enjoy economies of scale when purchasing, and in general external efficiencies get better. But at the same time they tend to become more complex internally with multiple management levels, physical and social distance between employees in different departments, more complicated decision making processes and more friction in general.</p>
<p>So a lack of agility within some big companies would likely prevent a growth hacking type model to whir within it. But in its purest &#8216;bootstrapping&#8217; sense growth hacking is not always necessary or the most efficient route to success anyway. Where a new business division can leverage the strength of established business models and a symbiotic ecosystem can be created, such as Apple succeeded in doing across its hardware and software business, then that is the quickest route to success, and Growth Hacking doctrine would demand that that is the route taken. <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="013a293b-923f-4f2e-90d3-d94bc7b9c466">iTunes</span> was never a standalone music store. The App Store only exists because of Apple&#8217;s mobile hardware. Building out <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="d21424c0-597d-4cba-9dad-60b6eb6f6167">an</span> consumer ecosystem in a pre-planned way can be the right approach, provided you get the <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="d3d9cca0-0961-4aad-a99d-4100ed3de40a">strategy</span> spot on.</p>
<p>Having said that, I <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="e2817d04-8da9-4cdd-86ac-b9a40984e549">remember</span> reading an interview many years ago I think after the iPod took off, in which Steve Jobs said that his main role was insulating his R&amp;D team from being influenced by the commercial influences elsewhere in the business, nurturing a <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="f770685a-48d7-4703-854b-696179eebc2b">free-thinking</span> environment for a group of super smart product designers and developers. Everyone knows what happened after that. Although I would not call Apple&#8217;s astounding run of <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="2322e6f3-54c1-4a54-b35b-b2cacfd8cae3">innovation growth</span> hacking, creating a free thinking context in which experiment can happen and a tight team can work fervently together is I believe also necessary for the growth hacking scenario.</p>
<h2>Rapid Prototyping cycles for product-market fit</h2>
<p>So when is Growth Hacking relevant and possible for big businesses? At its heart Growth Hacking is an ongoing series of experiments, each one built on the intelligence gained from the <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="f05a92cb-aa14-437b-9509-70823b4b602b">those</span> than <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="3c58d070-c98f-40b3-ae42-3741397aa316">ran</span> before it. This is essentially iterative prototyping, a concept that is no way a new idea for big companies, but in the case of web startups they are doing it in public, or to anyone who will pay attention, and getting feedback directly to tune the product and the marketing mechanics at the same time. For many <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="ee816352-24e9-4dc2-949a-4e447762b628">reasons not</span> least the desire to keep new developments unseen from competitors, it is harder for big companies to do this process in the open.</p>
<p>The iterative method is founded on data. If there is no way to capture the performance of the product as data and use that data to make informed decisions about how to improve the product and market it better <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="ef7c45a1-d445-4d46-bcdf-9359784d8b70">then</span> forget the Growth Hacking idea. It&#8217;s something else at that point. This may well limit <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="0851a346-4728-40ff-ba33-078ba8f8ac33">true</span> growth hacking <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="e59770a2-71e3-4535-b844-e18c456ac762">to</span> web and mobile companies where the products are literally plugged into the market itself, but I am open minded on this point. All kinds of products are getting hooked into the internet-of-things now, and reporting performance data back to engineers and designers. Either way it does not stop other companies from using the ideas and approaches that are bound up with growth hacking.</p>
<p>Implicit in the argument above is the assumption that the marketing model and the product experience can co-evolve together. Often when companies get big and established one ends up downstream of the other. In many growth-hacked web services these days, the user experience itself comprises viral mechanisms that bring other users in, so that the product does its own marketing. Even if the viral effects are not wired into the product in this way, the product and the way it is distributed needs to allow for really short prototyping cycles. This principle is something that big companies could learn from, or at least aspire to this ideal, since often they place marketing downstream of R&amp;D, which can end up in the miserable scenario of trying to sell products that are <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="af33bf39-8ffd-4eaa-86c2-d622a366182c">unsellable</span>.</p>
<h2>Connect customers &amp; growth team directly</h2>
<p>Spelling this principle out in terms of the people involved, the ideal is to <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="7d0ad6c8-7b1c-48c3-b5f9-706c0c1ea395">short cut</span> the feedback loop between those designing and creating the product and its ultimate customers as much as possible. The word &#8220;growth hacking&#8221; feels very cold and technical, not really the &#8216;human insight based thinking&#8217; that we like to boast about in marketing, nor the &#8216;customer centric culture&#8217; that corporate CEOs work so hard to advocate in their companies. In a way though the growth hacking approach is the MOST customer centric <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="ad07451b-7eff-4fef-8588-71e685fe903f">approach there</span> is, provided that the data being collected and used for <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="7e357fbb-c717-4f32-8331-daff6f5c3c60">optimising</span> with actually does represent the value the customers are bringing to your brand and bottom line, in both the short and long term.</p>
<p>Thus the quintessential growth hacking metrics-based process of experimentation and <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="e4e85d45-0a54-46fd-af3d-bb558e7162d6">optimisation</span> is in simple terms a way to short cut the &#8216;prototype &gt; test &gt; iterate&#8217; loop and make it spin as quickly as possible with the least separation between market and product evolution. This efficiency is what underpins the &#8220;fastest route to success&#8221; philosophy at the <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="1492db15-bd0a-46ca-b3a0-76df37332da6">heard</span> of the growth hacking movement.</p>
<p>Anyone who has worked in a science laboratory or R&amp;D lab <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="9fca4ff6-18c5-4335-ae58-7104f0750306">recognises</span> this process, and so in a sense growth hacking <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="8923e2dd-0da3-48d2-973b-ca4f06099022">start-ups</span> have effectively put the lab at the <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="e5ea8a86-6cdb-4379-a794-5e38047cd709">centre</span> of the business. In too many big businesses not only can the R&amp;D department become a costly appendage, but the scientific approach often loses out to internal politics or other constraints, or else the R&amp;D amounts to just <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="e251cb01-c336-4353-8f18-06ea63cd4665">tinkering</span> with existing formats because the bigger vision has been forgotten or become obsolete.</p>
<h2>Defining the necessary conditions</h2>
<p>So I believe big companies can benefit from <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="61575a47-4727-4e99-ac85-b0bfa3862e0f">growth hacking style approach</span> to growing a new business model, but they have to set up the context to mirror to some extent that of a startup in the following ways:</p>
<ul>
<li>It should be run by a few people who &#8220;own it&#8221;: passionate about the idea and strongly <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="25ae37a9-5fe4-49cb-8f44-fecc653949c4">incentivised</span> to make it work, ideally through equity ownership</li>
<li>These leaders should be given the responsibility to take decisions without <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="d53de63f-5f76-41e7-85fc-f49e20244b9c">committee agreement</span>, leading to forthright decision making and accountability</li>
<li>Allow risk taking and accept failure as a natural part of the process. Experimentation is needed to hit on the right formula, and you are unlikely to hit on <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="c4c8bdef-8032-4b42-8680-b1fb94e6d1df">it</span> first time.</li>
<li>Start off with as few people as possible. The last thing the leaders need is a big team to manage before they know what it is they need to be doing.</li>
<li>You need to create an efficient, no-fat-on-the-bone base upon which to build out a profitable model. Too much resource early on, either people or money, will lead to inefficiencies that will at worse kill it prematurely, or else get baked into the business and restrict profitability later on.</li>
<li>Give the business brand-independence, enough for it to be able to tell its own stories and connect to a distinct audience that becomes its early adopter customer base from which an early majority can be recruited.</li>
</ul>
<h2>The importance of a brand narrative</h2>
<p>This last point about the need for brand independence is often forgotten I believe, but companies whose founders understand how to grow a brand often take off faster and win big in the long term. This is because they are making the technology mean something more than what its features would imply on their own. In my experience people often forget that the experience people <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="49277ac3-1fb0-4f2b-b361-adfdc183f003">have is</span> fundamentally different depending on what they are looking to get out of it, and this is dependent on how well it is branded and the communications around it. <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="f909698f-7835-47a4-9ec9-f7914386ed4b">No first</span> time user touches a feature set without preconceptions, so framing this interaction and the ongoing usage is the role of the brand.</p>
<p>Founders and companies with simple, powerful brand identities and compelling ideas around their technology, such as Phil Libin with Evernote&#8217;s &#8220;remember everything&#8221;, or Mark Beniof&#8217;s with Salesforce.com death-to-software narrative, are so good at selling their technology story that we forget just what masters they are at branding. Both men had plenty of business experience before founding the companies that made them famous, and it shows.</p>
<p>I would say that successful startups always have a strong &#8220;<span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="66880c10-169f-4c4b-9b8a-2c3a14d8e300">founders</span> story&#8221;, a vision to make the world better, core values, that for better or worse get baked into the brand perception from early on. Even if they are not a consumer-facing brand, this narrative is important for getting others excited about its potential, which is always necessary. These stakeholders are the investors, journalists and early hires in tech startups. But the same thing goes for new business models springing off big business, where the equivalents would be the board members, the individuals transferred in or hired into the business as well as the consumers who would adopt the new product.</p>
<p>So although it is very hard to <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="5f1a5e04-61b6-494c-b9ab-161ba302b430">generalise</span> about how business models should get <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="4111ca5f-54a2-4176-b696-02bfae27b49a">built</span> out, the brand story and how it enables businesses to captivate each subsequent audience as it builds its following is one, and the other is the way the internal team expands.</p>
<h2>Growth teams and growth hackers</h2>
<p>It is my belief that team structure is the most important area of growth hacking for big or established companies to take note of, not least in starting off slim, but what type of people are brought into the mix.</p>
<p>If we <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="12a05ab0-db8b-4c08-9de0-1920bf4bd4bb">generalise</span> a <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="2aee357a-83fa-4609-8e87-2b9fdc92f83d">growth</span> team into specialists and generalist, a room full of generalists is not ideal, but then nor is a room full of specialists, and yet this is often the make up you see.</p>
<p>You definitely need deep vertical expertise. <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="8664c76b-28e5-431c-b145-a3a9d19d8ac4">In</span> a web start up you might have an SEM specialist, a PR specialist, a contents marketing / social media specialist and product developer as the first 4 members of a <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="bd6bbe20-e9af-439d-abc6-6eecb9969722">growth</span> team. The challenge is getting these relatively diverse skill sets to work cohesively together so that much needed synergies emerge. It is even harder in big companies where these verticals might already exist as distinct departments, potentially physically separated.</p>
<p>In order to get them working <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="47fbea0d-98d8-4ed5-8704-968fd50f08cb">synergistically</span> you need someone who can speak all all their respective lingoes, and who has a sense for the difference between just showing up in that area, and actually driving competitive advantage. Who is that person? It needs to be someone who has themselves <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="e515632a-9cfc-49aa-bb0b-af086c7b900a">dived</span> into these skill sets at one point, not to the extent that they became an expert in all of them, but typically in one area at least.</p>
<p>These multi-skilled individuals are the sort of people who, being quick learners, dive headlong into a knowledge <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="31c7f3f6-0e30-4bf1-b014-271af496c41d">specialism</span> for a while, get to the point where they understand 90% of it, can perceive the nature of expertise in that last 10%, but do not fancy spending the next 3+ years <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="90605623-990b-437d-9958-5956d814bc06">to perfect</span> those skills themselves. And then they move on to another vertical. They get bored as quickly as they get inspired, but rather than being a weakness, it equips them with a rare combination of literacies.</p>
<h2>Not T-shaped, but &#8220;rake-shaped&#8221; talent is key</h2>
<p>In management theory they are similar to the T-shaped people, but actually more like a &#8220;rake&#8221;, or Japanese &#8220;<span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="88fa8dc5-7cd9-4a9f-915b-a6f04005115f">kuma</span>&#8211;<span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="743d4e48-8ca3-4949-806c-41dc1cd0d2c3">te</span>&#8221; meaning &#8220;bear&#8217;s claw&#8221;. You heard it here first! Ideally you can find one of these talents who also has leadership potential, and build the team around them, since they can be the bridge that gets the teams working together efficiently.</p>
<p>These sorts of people are rare and hence very valuable assets, especially if the areas they can bridge between map to the necessary skill sets of your business, and have the communication skills to forge a team spirit. These <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="51f2bbd6-9dd7-481c-b432-555011ae5e1c">sorts</span> have been key drivers in the growth of the US silicon valley tech startups, where they are highly prized but they are even rarer in Japan. These people represent the &#8220;growth hacker&#8221; archetype, and <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="ff3e54f8-26b1-4049-8df0-e3d74dcad90c">so perhaps more so</span> than &#8220;growth hacking&#8221; the approach, it is this archetypal skill set that is most important to highlight beyond <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="c1361742-5b58-44af-ab95-3c982d876dc6">web</span> and mobile startups.</p>
<p>In Japan deep vertical expertise is celebrated and rewarded. Finding your craft and plugging away at it for a lifetime earns you respect and career progression. This is no bad thing, and Japan&#8217;s ongoing success as an economic force <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="a4573a96-5eb1-4270-a36b-072ead1b8f7c">is built</span> on this tradition. Japan does not have a shortage of specialist, I believe.</p>
<p>However, the way companies and careers are structured it makes it hard for multi-disciplinary careers to be nurtured within companies, and hence there are not many growth hacker types around, and I believe this is a limiting factor <span class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark" id="33cb7bf9-3e34-4009-b5f5-4b0df6b82ea3">on</span> Japan&#8217;s economic success going forward that needs to be addressed.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/growth-hacking-for-brands-and-how-to-grow-a-hybrid-team/">Growth Hacking for brands and how to grow a hybrid team</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/growth-hacking-for-brands-and-how-to-grow-a-hybrid-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Becoming a creative hybrid &#8211; Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 3: Culture Hack 2007</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-3-culture-hack-2007/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-3-culture-hack-2007/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The third post in my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid memoirs&#8221; series, describing my experiences growing a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers the middle of 2007 when we ran a run away hit campaign that was a &#8220;culture hack&#8221; on Mixi&#8217;s burgeoning social platform that played off mainstream [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-3-culture-hack-2007/">Becoming a creative hybrid &#8211; Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 3: Culture Hack 2007</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_172" style="width: 359px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Puchi-Bruce-B+w.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-172" alt="Puchi Bruce Puchi DieHard Episode I  " src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Puchi-Bruce-B+w.png" width="349" height="347" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Puchi Bruce Puchi DieHard Episode I</p></div>
<p>The third post in my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid memoirs&#8221; series, describing my experiences growing a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers the middle of 2007 when we ran a run away hit campaign that was a &#8220;culture hack&#8221; on Mixi&#8217;s burgeoning social platform that played off mainstream media and Hollywood icons by creating a novel Hollywood x Web creative hybrid space.</p>
<p>The first episode of my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid can be read <a title="Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo memoirs chapter 1: 2004~2005" href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-1/">here!</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center">*************************<br />
Tokyo memoirs chapter 3: A &#8220;Puchi&#8221; viral hit</p>
<p>By the start of 2007 we were starting to get on a role, and then in the spring of that year came our big break: a pitch for a campaign to promote a high profile Hollywood movie Die Hard 4.0, the 4th of the hugely successful series. The brief was as open as you could hope for, maybe too open: create massive buzz leading up to the Japan premier event which would be attended by the film&#8217;s main star, Bruce Willis.</p>
<p>We thought long and hard. Although Mixi had dragged Japan&#8217;s social web out of the gutter, it was still the &#8216;alternative medium&#8217; compared to TV, print and cinema. Its users felt it belonged to them, and that they were empowered to create their own second culture, which also commented on and reflected the culture of the mainstream media, and within which anti-hero cults could thrive. We noted the juxtaposition of this culture and its anti-heroes with the visiting Hollywood celebrity Bruce Willis, and his god-like status in Japan. How could we catalyse a mini phenomenon in this space?</p>
<p>The other new arrival on the scene at this time was YouTube. Although not Japanese, YouTube was adopted rapidly in Japan where the unrivaled upload and download internet speeds allowed for a seamless experience, even before YouTube was officially in Japan with a Japanese UI. Like any open creative space YouTube had spawned its own video genres, one of which was the homage video, where fans of a particular film would reenact their favourite scenes and share them with the community. My co-founder and lead video creator, Dicky Chalmers, was a keen observer of the homage video phenomenon, so when he stumbled across a laughably bad Japanese impersonator of Die Hard&#8217;s lead character &#8220;John McClain&#8221;, called &#8220;Puchi Bruce&#8221; (where Puchi, derived from the french &#8220;petit&#8221; implying diminutive or puny), the threads all came together.</p>
<p>We got hold of just enough budget to make 5 homage videos of the 5 most memorable scenes from Die Hard 1 ~ 3 casting Puchi Bruce in the John McClain role. Critical to the success of the campaign, and a point of contention with the client, was the sincerity with which these scenes were reenacted. Although the acting from the impersonator and the C-list foreign talent that we cast in the other roles was comically bad, we were adamant that it should always be sincere, without a hint of sarcasm as you might expect in the US or UK for instance. Executed in this way the films positioned Puchi as a genuine fan, not someone trying to get some cheap laughs and a little slice of fame, and hence allowed him to be endearing to Mixi&#8217;s users, someone who they want to get behind and turn into a puchi-celebrity.</p>
<p><a href="http://youtu.be/GxCX74QGqQw">Puchi DieHard Episode I</a></p>
<p>By making the films look like the product of a group of die-hard fans of the series, faithfully recreating their favourite scenes, we were able to pass everything off as an unofficial movement unconnected to the film studio, which suited them perfectly since Bruce Willis could not abide impersonation. In this way the videos were proof of Puchi&#8217;s obsessed dedication as a die-hard fan of the series, qualities that Japan&#8217;s subcultures respect beyond all others.</p>
<p>We had one of our team, a former make-up artist who we had recruited not least for his big Mixi-footprint, ghost write a blog and a &#8220;MyMixi&#8221; account for Puchi which we popularised using various growth-hacking tricks that we had worked out using Mixi&#8217;s social mechanisms, both of which really took off. We hit the Mixi friend limit pretty quickly, and every update we put up garnered a chorus of well wishing comments. The blog too had got real traction, to the extent that shortly before the premier it became the #1 ranked talent blog in Japan.</p>
<p>All this buzz online did not go unnoticed by the mass media. Puchi got noticed by TV producers who invited him onto their variety shows with TV ratings of 9%, 10%, 12% of the nation. Puchi had hit the Big time, as it were. He would appear on the shows, do his hapless impersonation, as the studio guests collapsed in mirth around him, but the upcoming Die Hard 4.0 release was always noted of course, meaning the film was getting great publicity.</p>
<p>Although we had succeeded before in building a campaign strategy that played out over time, this was the first time we were able to craft a narrative along with it, the arc of which concluded with the premier event. The studio had separately run a campaign to invite 100 bloggers to attend the premier. We had built the impersonators persona around his dream to meet his hero face to face, the permier event representing his one and only chance. He (we) applied to the blogger lottery, but were rejected and then publicly approached the studio to be invited, but were rejected. The TV shows loved it. His fans on Mixi and on his blog reassured him that he was the real superstar. In the story arc of the anti-hero, the climax is rejection by the hero, and he was loved even more for it.</p>
<p>Reflecting on the relative astronomic success of this campaign we realized that while we employed numerous growth-hacker like technical tricks to propagate our content on Mixi and YouTube, the biggest factor in our success was a cultural hack: understanding how the subcultures of the web play off the mainstream, and vice versa, and how creating and nurturing characters within that can lead to social phenomena.</p>
<p>To this day as much as I am a student of the technology-based growth hacks as the web evolves, I still look to culture hacks to create game-changing growth effects, and within this unique personalities undergoing an archetypal transformation in full view of a curious audience work particularly well.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">+++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>See here for all the articles to date in my <a href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/category/memoirs/">Tokyo Memoirs Series</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-3-culture-hack-2007/">Becoming a creative hybrid &#8211; Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 3: Culture Hack 2007</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-3-culture-hack-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo memoirs chapter 2: 2005~2006</title>
		<link>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-2/</link>
		<comments>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-2/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hollow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshollow.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The second post in my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid memoirs&#8221; series, describing my experiences growing a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers roughly the 2nd and 3rd years of Alien-Eye, during which we struck upon a winning formula for creating viral video contents in Japan, and came of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-2/">Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo memoirs chapter 2: 2005~2006</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_145" style="width: 491px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/TheUrbanSamurai_TitleSequence.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-145" alt="The Urban Samurai by Alien-Eye" src="http://jameshollow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/TheUrbanSamurai_TitleSequence.png" width="481" height="267" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Title screen from the viral web movie series &#8220;The Urban Samurai&#8221;, Alien-Eye circa 2005</p></div>
<p>The second post in my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid memoirs&#8221; series, describing my experiences growing a hybrid creative company in Tokyo which I co-founded in 2004. This chapter covers roughly the 2nd and 3rd years of Alien-Eye, during which we struck upon a winning formula for creating viral video contents in Japan, and came of age as &#8220;growth hackers&#8221;, the more recent term for marketers that focus on high impact low budget growth tactics on digital. This period also includes the emergence of Mixi as a cultural force in Japan, which we embraced as the first open social platform for sharing content and which marked the paradigm shift from &#8220;viral&#8221; to &#8220;social&#8221;.</p>
<p><a title="Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo memoirs chapter 1: 2004~2005" href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-1/">The first episode of my &#8220;becoming a creative hybrid can be read here!</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center">*************************</p>
<p><strong>Tokyo memoirs chapter 2: Creative traction</strong></p>
<p>In my last year in Ogilvy Japan, prior to establishing Alien-Eye, a school friend visited me in Tokyo with his girlfriend. After leaving school he had gone off to study fine art, creating a wonderfully free-thinking house of artists near the excellent art college where he studied. After each term of mind bending physics and applied mathematics at Oxford I would escape to his retreat and plug into the alternative vibe.</p>
<p>By the time I was in Japan he had established a boutique fashion label &#8220;Rogue Chimp&#8221; (this was way before Bathing Ape emerged, in case anyone was wondering!). He was keen to bring the chimp to the uber-fashionable Japan. I managed to identify a potential first distributor, a fashion entrepreneur who ran a graphic design based clothing label called &#8220;Shop 33&#8243; that was tied into the graphic design cultures of both Japan and the UK.</p>
<p>Although my friend&#8217;s label never made it big in Japan, it was a significant episode both for Alien-Eye, since &#8220;Shop 33&#8243; became our first viral campaign client, and also for me personally as the owner also inadvertently introduced me to the woman who became my wife, mother to my children and love of my life. So in some ways my children owe their lives to a rogue chimp. It&#8217;s funny how the world works sometimes!</p>
<p>The brief from Shop33 was to grow the notoriety of his brand in the UK, and we told him that with as little budget as he had his only hope was a viral video based campaign. The concept that Dicky came up with for the videos, &#8220;The Urban Samurai&#8221; deliberated played off Japanese traditional culture, but blended with contemporary elements, like the seedy sets and the slick title sequence. The title track was &#8220;inspired&#8221; by a 70&#8217;s TV anime theme track, but recreated with a big hip-hop base treatment. It was designed to appeal to the UK&#8217;s graphic design and fashion creative community who we knew perceived would be intrigued by this sort of aesthetic and quirky stories.</p>
<p>It was a significant milestone on the path to becoming an accomplished &#8220;growth hacker&#8221;, not so much for meteoric success of the campaign, since it was not meteoric although did OK, but because it exposed me to the ferocity of the singular success metric, in that case video views, and this in a world before YouTube, if you can imagine that!</p>
<p style="text-align: left">The following year after launching the Shop33 movies series, entitled &#8220;The Urban Samurai&#8221;, we started using YouTube as an online reel, and the videos can still be seen up there.  Here is the second from the series:</p>
<p>If you have never lived day and night for a period of your life by a single metric then I do not think you can call yourself a growth hacker. There is no hiding from it, and without a media budget, seeding slush fund, or some other way of buying success, it is both crushingly transparent and liberatingly honest as a measure of the worth of your efforts. Over the years since I have lived-the-single-metric on numerous campaigns and growth-hacking pushes for brands, and although I now have a bigger team with more skills sets to help make them a success, the excitement remains undiminished. Although the web is a much more sophisticated creature now, in many cases it does all come down to a single metric, albeit with quality checks.</p>
<p>Based on the Shop33 experience we pitched and won a similar pre-YouTube video based campaign for an international low cost airline trying to break into the well-protected Japanese market. Working with a very smart and liberated soul at their agency we came up with an idea, probably for the first time (that we got to execute anyway), that was a perfect fit for Japan. An international band had licensed their global hit track to the airline. Digging around we noticed that a Japanese comedian had won the world air guitar championships in Helsinki, where they like their air guitar, performing to this same tune.</p>
<p>Forget clever, conceptual creativity, do not ask your audience to think deeply, but instead create an original cultural realm married with an aesthetic space of the moment and run with it. Thus was born the world&#8217;s first air guitar video submission contest. By this time we had realized the importance of tying into offline touchpoints to activate online buzz and so created air guitar booths at the band&#8217;s concerts, and creating seed content to inspire users to create and submit their own. It was also through this campaign that we managed to pull in a multi-talented Japanese producer, a guy with a common touch for creative in any channel and who could get stuff done. He later became my main partner in the business.</p>
<p>By the time we were leading this crazy air-guitar subculture, another force was at work that was multiplying the effectiveness of our efforts. Mixi was here and with scale. It marked the shift from the &#8216;viral&#8217; era to the &#8216;social&#8217; era, pretty much before anywhere else in the world, at least on a significant societal scale. Essentially a copycat of Friendster, the SNS that laid the ground for Facebook but paid the price for being too early, Mixi was the right social model for Japan&#8217;s privacy conscious users of the era.</p>
<p>With anonymous accounts, and driven by the passive &#8220;footprint&#8221; social mechanism (members can see which other members looked at their profile page), it hockey-sticked, boasting a billion monthly PVs on PC before Mark Zuckerburg had his braces removed, and a billion on mobile before Facebook was a blip on VC&#8217;s radars. All of sudden cool people had somewhere to hang out online, a galaxy of communities sprung up around common interests, informational needs and gossip, and at last there was a platform within which content could really thrive.</p>
<p>We soon realized that it was all very well making interesting content, but you need people to help socialize it to make a business out of it. One of the best hires we made at this time was a make up artist who we had used on several of our video shoots who had a big network on Mixi who had been spending his time between styling fashion shows transcribing computer code. We told him to spend the time at our office instead. He is now one of our top creative producers working across all kinds of brand categories. It is funny how things turn out.</p>
<p>++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>The next instalment, <a title="Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo Memoirs Chapter 3: Culture Hack 2007" href="http://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-3-culture-hack-2007/">Chapter 3 &#8211; Culture hack 2007 can be read here!</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-2/">Becoming a creative hybrid – Tokyo memoirs chapter 2: 2005~2006</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://jameshollow.com">James Hollow&#039;s Blog about Hybrid Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jameshollow.com/blog/becoming-a-creative-hybrid-tokyo-memoirs-chapter-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
